Horvath F L
J Allied Health. 1983 Nov;12(4):245-8.
This article is the text of a presentation for the plenary session of the October 1981 meeting of the Committee on Allied Health Education and Accreditation (CAHEA) and its panel of consultants and special advisors. The legal, philosophical, and practical aspects of rights and responsibilities in the accreditation process are examined from the institutions' perspective. Excerpts from the various CAHEA review committee's Essentials and Guidelines are cited as examples of how accrediting agencies unwittingly infringe on institutional prerogatives. The article suggests the need for institutions, allied health professions, and accrediting agencies to collaborate and to establish more realistic accreditation standards.
本文是1981年10月联合健康职业教育与认证委员会（CAHEA）全会及其顾问小组和特别顾问小组会议上一份演讲的文本。从院校的角度审视了认证过程中权利与责任的法律、哲学和实践方面。引用了CAHEA各审查委员会《基本要求与指南》中的节选内容，作为认证机构如何不经意间侵犯院校特权的例证。本文指出院校、联合健康职业和认证机构需要开展合作，并制定更现实的认证标准。
