Suppr超能文献

婚姻沟通量表的结构效度。

Construct validity of the marital communication inventory.

作者信息

Schumm W R, Anderson S A, Race G S, Morris J E, Griffin C L, McCutchen M B, Benigas J E

出版信息

J Sex Marital Ther. 1983 Summer;9(2):153-62. doi: 10.1080/00926238308405842.

Abstract

The Marital Communication Inventory (MCI) is an extremely popular self-report measure of marital communication that has been used in over 65 dissertations and empirical articles since 1970, including several recent clinical reports that used the MCI as a principal outcome measure. However, contrary to its treatment in the clinical literature as a unidimensional, valid measure of treatment outcome, the MCI appears to be a multidimensional instrument, whose primary dimension may not be a specific style or method of communication. Using a canonical correlation analysis of data from over 200 midwestern wives, we compared MCI subscales with subscales from an abbreviated version of the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory (RI). Results supported the hypothesis that the primary dimension of the MCI is more closely associated with positive regard than with the more specific communication dimensions of either empathy or congruence as measured by the RI. Future clinical research in the improvement of marital communication should use the MCI in a much more careful way in order to provide the most valid outcome data.

摘要

婚姻沟通量表(MCI)是一种极其流行的婚姻沟通自我报告测量工具,自1970年以来已在超过65篇论文和实证文章中使用,包括几篇最近将MCI作为主要结果测量指标的临床报告。然而,与临床文献中将其视为治疗结果的单维度有效测量方法不同,MCI似乎是一种多维度工具,其主要维度可能不是特定的沟通风格或方法。通过对200多名中西部妻子的数据进行典型相关分析,我们将MCI子量表与巴雷特-伦纳德关系量表(RI)简版的子量表进行了比较。结果支持了这样的假设,即MCI的主要维度与积极关注的关联比与RI所测量的同理心或一致性等更具体的沟通维度更为密切。未来旨在改善婚姻沟通的临床研究应以更加谨慎的方式使用MCI,以便提供最有效的结果数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验