Spengler A, Hagenah R, Friedrich G
Psychiatr Prax. 1983 Nov;10(6):200-8.
6 investigators of a "Psychiatric Emergency Service" recorded 299 outpatient emergency cases which required immediate involuntary admission in accordance with a new Hamburg Civil Law. To identify the factors exercising an influence on the indication for involuntary admission, the 299 interventions were compared resulting in outpatient treatment (n = 93) vs. voluntary admission (n = 84) vs. involuntary admission (n = 122). It was shown that the factors "diagnosis", "hazard", and, in particular, the interaction between patient and emergency physician, mainly determine the indication. The interactions of these factors are differentiated in detail, with respect to age, sex, and social factors.
“精神科急诊服务”的6名调查人员记录了299例门诊急诊病例,这些病例根据新的汉堡民法需要立即非自愿入院。为了确定对非自愿入院指征有影响的因素,对299例干预措施进行了比较,结果是门诊治疗(n = 93)、自愿入院(n = 84)和非自愿入院(n = 122)。结果表明,“诊断”“危险”,尤其是患者与急诊医生之间的互动,主要决定了指征。这些因素的相互作用在年龄、性别和社会因素方面进行了详细区分。