Suppr超能文献

颈椎前路不同骨水泥固定方式的比较强度

Comparative strengths of various anterior cement fixations of the cervical spine.

作者信息

Wang G J, Lewish G D, Reger S I, Jennings R L, Hubbard S L, McLaurin C A, Stamp W G

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Oct;8(7):717-21. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198310000-00006.

Abstract

In vivo study, using cadaveric dog cervical spine, was performed in which the middle segment of the vertebral body was removed producing anterior instability. Eleven various methods of stabilization utilizing polymethylmethacrylate and other fixation devices were employed, and their static strength in hyperextension was tested and compared. A portion of the same dog's cervical spine in each case was used as a control. The results indicate that all fixation methods failed to regain the normal structural strength in extension. Cement with wire or chain methods of fixation were superior to other methods in this study. Fixation rigidity approaching rigidity of the normal spine appeared to be a significant factor determining the strength of the reconstructed cervical spine. Combined anterior and posterior fixation did not provide further strength, although it did increase the rigidity of the fixation.

摘要

采用犬尸体颈椎进行了一项体内研究,在该研究中去除椎体中段造成前路不稳定。使用了11种利用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和其他固定装置的不同稳定方法,并对它们在过伸位的静态强度进行了测试和比较。每种情况下,同一只犬颈椎的一部分用作对照。结果表明,所有固定方法均未能恢复伸展时的正常结构强度。在本研究中,钢丝或链条固定的骨水泥方法优于其他方法。接近正常脊柱刚度的固定刚度似乎是决定重建颈椎强度的一个重要因素。前路和后路联合固定虽然确实增加了固定的刚度,但并未提供更大的强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验