Wang G J, Lewish G D, Reger S I, Jennings R L, Hubbard S L, McLaurin C A, Stamp W G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Oct;8(7):717-21. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198310000-00006.
In vivo study, using cadaveric dog cervical spine, was performed in which the middle segment of the vertebral body was removed producing anterior instability. Eleven various methods of stabilization utilizing polymethylmethacrylate and other fixation devices were employed, and their static strength in hyperextension was tested and compared. A portion of the same dog's cervical spine in each case was used as a control. The results indicate that all fixation methods failed to regain the normal structural strength in extension. Cement with wire or chain methods of fixation were superior to other methods in this study. Fixation rigidity approaching rigidity of the normal spine appeared to be a significant factor determining the strength of the reconstructed cervical spine. Combined anterior and posterior fixation did not provide further strength, although it did increase the rigidity of the fixation.
采用犬尸体颈椎进行了一项体内研究,在该研究中去除椎体中段造成前路不稳定。使用了11种利用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和其他固定装置的不同稳定方法,并对它们在过伸位的静态强度进行了测试和比较。每种情况下,同一只犬颈椎的一部分用作对照。结果表明,所有固定方法均未能恢复伸展时的正常结构强度。在本研究中,钢丝或链条固定的骨水泥方法优于其他方法。接近正常脊柱刚度的固定刚度似乎是决定重建颈椎强度的一个重要因素。前路和后路联合固定虽然确实增加了固定的刚度,但并未提供更大的强度。