MacInnes W D, Golden C J, McFadden J, Wilkening G N
Int J Neurosci. 1983 Nov;21(3-4):257-64. doi: 10.3109/00207458308986143.
This study compares total errors on the Booklet Form of the Category Test (DeFilippis, McCampbell & Rogers, 1979) with several scores of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Heaton, 1981). In a heterogeneous sample of 30 neurologically impaired patients and 31 normal individuals the two tests exhibited a maximum correlation of 0.52 when partialing out the effects of age and education. In addition, this study suggests that the two exhibit similar overall diagnostic hit rates; however, they differ in false negatives and false positives. These results bring into question the assumption that these two neuropsychological tests are interchangeable. A need to recognize the nature of the differences between the tests in their clinical applications and in future research is discussed.
本研究比较了类别测验手册版(DeFilippis、McCampbell和Rogers,1979年)的总错误数与威斯康星卡片分类测验的多个分数(Heaton,1981年)。在一个由30名神经功能受损患者和31名正常个体组成的异质性样本中,在排除年龄和教育程度的影响后,这两项测验的最大相关性为0.52。此外,本研究表明,这两项测验的总体诊断命中率相似;然而,它们在假阴性和假阳性方面存在差异。这些结果使人们对这两项神经心理学测验可互换的假设产生了质疑。文中讨论了在临床应用和未来研究中认识到这两项测验之间差异性质的必要性。