Health is commonly conceived as having fixed and universal aims, while conditions interposed by environmental and cultural conditions are often ignored or at least shunted to one side. Rejecting this point of view, the author asserts that health in any society should be defined in terms of ecological reality--that is, in terms of the cultural and environmental variables affecting the population. He also notes that acceptance of this concept does not imply perpetuation of a natural but static situation. Rather, it implies searching for ways to improve the situation without necessarily striving for international goals that may be unsuitable or impossible to achieve. The concept also implies that we should ask how to define a satisfactory health level for a given set of conditions--and then consider how to achieve that level. The search for answers to these questions and subsequent programs based on the results will require a multidisciplinary approach. Within this context two PAHO facilities, the Pan American Center for Human Ecology and Health (ECO) and the Pan American Center and Engineering and Environmental Sciences (CEPIS), can provide strong support for activities in the Americas. Specifically, ECO is in a good position to collaborate on ecological planning, model-building, and research evaluation, while CEPIS is geared to provide advice and assistance in the key field of environmental sanitation.
健康通常被认为具有固定和普遍的目标,而由环境和文化条件所造成的情况往往被忽视,或者至少被搁置一旁。作者反对这种观点,断言任何社会的健康都应以生态现实来界定,也就是说,要依据影响人群的文化和环境变量来界定。他还指出,接受这一概念并不意味着维持一种自然但静止的状况。相反,这意味着寻求改善状况的方法,而不必追求那些可能不合适或无法实现的国际目标。这一概念还意味着我们应探讨如何为特定的一组条件界定一个令人满意的健康水平,然后考虑如何达到这一水平。寻找这些问题的答案以及随后基于结果制定的方案将需要采用多学科方法。在此背景下,泛美卫生组织的两个机构,即泛美人类生态与健康中心(ECO)和泛美工程与环境科学中心(CEPIS),可为美洲的相关活动提供有力支持。具体而言,ECO在生态规划、模型构建和研究评估方面具有良好的合作条件,而CEPIS则准备好在环境卫生这一关键领域提供咨询和援助。