Richardson D
J Homosex. 1983;9(2-3):79-90. doi: 10.1300/j082v09n02_05.
A close examination of the literature on homosexuality reveals a long history of definitional crises in which the central consideration has been the maintenance of a belief in homosexuality as a state of being. This paper asks what, if anything, can be considered essential to the homosexual category. To answer this question, various approaches to homosexuality in the literature have been examined: as a general state of being (the person), as a state of desire (sexual orientation), as a form of behavior (sexual acts), and, more recently, as a personal identification (sexual identity). In addition, the interrelationships of these categorizations are explored.
对同性恋相关文献的仔细审视揭示了一段漫长的定义危机历史,其中核心考量一直是维持对同性恋作为一种存在状态的信念。本文探讨对于同性恋类别而言,若有什么能被视为本质要素的话,那会是什么。为回答这个问题,已审视了文献中对同性恋的各种研究方法:将其视为一种普遍的存在状态(个体)、欲望状态(性取向)、行为形式(性行为),以及最近将其视为一种个人认同(性身份)。此外,还探究了这些分类之间的相互关系。