Suppr超能文献

新型咪唑类抗真菌药联苯苄唑与克霉唑和咪康唑的体外研究

In vitro studies of a new imidazole antimycotic, bifonazole, in comparison with clotrimazole and miconazole.

作者信息

Yamaguchi H, Hiratani T, Plempel M

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1983;33(4):546-51.

PMID:6683531
Abstract

The in vitro activity of 1-[(4-Biphenylyl)-phenylmethyl]-1H-imidazole bifonazole, Bay h 4502, Mycospor) a new antifungal imidazole derivative, against a variety of medically important fungi were studied using an agar dilution procedure. Two imidazole drugs which have already appeared on the market as topical antimycotics, clotrimazole and miconazole, were also tested as reference drugs. MIC values of bifonazole to a range of pathogenic fungi and yeasts ranged from 0.04 to 80 micrograms/ml, but mostly were less than 2.5 micrograms/ml. The antifungal potency of bifonazole relative to that of clotrimazole and miconazole varied from strains to strains or from species to species. For example, almost all strains of dermatophytes were less susceptible to bifonazole than clotrimazole and the least susceptible to miconazole. Against most other fungi tested bifonazole was similar to or greater than clotrimazole and/or miconazole in inhibitory activity. The activity against Candida species increased in the order of bifonazole, miconazole and clotrimazole. When tested against other pathogenic yeasts such as T. glabrata and C. neoformans, bifonazole was more active than clotrimazole, and compared favorably with miconazole. Bifonazole and the other two imidazole derivatives inhibited the growth of most fungi at concentrations well below their quoted MICs. Composition and pH of culture medium, as well as fungal inoculum size, significantly altered the activity of bifonazole. A brief discussion of the possible clinical usefulness of bifonazole is given.

摘要

采用琼脂稀释法研究了新型抗真菌咪唑衍生物1-[(4-联苯基)-苯基甲基]-1H-咪唑联苯苄唑(Bay h 4502,Mycospor)对多种医学上重要真菌的体外活性。还测试了两种已作为局部抗真菌药上市的咪唑类药物克霉唑和咪康唑作为参考药物。联苯苄唑对一系列致病真菌和酵母菌的MIC值范围为0.04至80微克/毫升,但大多数低于2.5微克/毫升。联苯苄唑相对于克霉唑和咪康唑的抗真菌效力因菌株或物种而异。例如,几乎所有皮肤癣菌菌株对联苯苄唑的敏感性均低于克霉唑,对咪康唑的敏感性最低。对于大多数其他测试真菌,联苯苄唑在抑制活性方面与克霉唑和/或咪康唑相似或更高。对念珠菌属的活性按联苯苄唑、咪康唑和克霉唑的顺序增加。当针对其他致病酵母菌如光滑念珠菌和新型隐球菌进行测试时,联苯苄唑比克霉唑更具活性,与咪康唑相比也表现良好。联苯苄唑和其他两种咪唑衍生物在远低于其公布的MIC的浓度下就能抑制大多数真菌的生长。培养基的组成和pH值以及真菌接种量显著改变了联苯苄唑的活性。文中对联苯苄唑可能的临床应用进行了简要讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验