• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性骨髓瘤的临床分期及治疗结果

Clinical staging and therapeutic results in multiple myeloma.

作者信息

Santoro A, Schieppati G, Franchi F, Valagussa P, Monfardini S

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983 Oct;19(10):1353-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(93)90003-n.

DOI:10.1016/0277-5379(93)90003-n
PMID:6685627
Abstract

The validity of the Durie and Salmon's clinical staging system for multiple myeloma has been tested in 81 consecutive patients studied at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan from January 1970 to June 1982. Median survival from diagnosis was 48 months for stage I, 41 months for stage II and 23 months for stage III (P = 0.02). Median survival of patients with normal renal function (A) was 35 months and of those with abnormal kidney function (B) 7 months. Almost all early deaths were observed in patients with stage III disease associated with renal failure. No statistically significant difference was found in the median survival in patients with kappa and those with lambda light chains. The analysis of survival according to the three main combinations of chemotherapy used in this study (melphalan-prednisone vs melphalan-procarbazine-prednisone vs adriamycin-prednisone) could not disclose any significant difference. Prognosis was, however, closely related to the response to combination chemotherapy: median survival was 72 months in responders, 36 months in patients with improvement and 25 months in non-responders (P less than 0.01). A lower incidence of response was obtained in patients with stage III myeloma compared to patients with stage I-II. The myeloma staging system used in this study is simple to employ and allows identification of truly comparable patient groups in the evaluation of therapeutic results. Our therapeutic results confirm the effectiveness of melphalan plus prednisone and fail to demonstrate any advantage in the administration of adriamycin as first-line therapy.

摘要

1970年1月至1982年6月期间,米兰国立肿瘤研究所对81例连续性多发性骨髓瘤患者进行研究,以检验Durie和Salmon临床分期系统的有效性。I期患者从诊断开始的中位生存期为48个月,II期为41个月,III期为23个月(P = 0.02)。肾功能正常(A)患者的中位生存期为35个月,肾功能异常(B)患者为7个月。几乎所有早期死亡病例均见于合并肾衰竭的III期疾病患者。κ轻链患者和λ轻链患者的中位生存期无统计学显著差异。根据本研究中使用的三种主要化疗联合方案(美法仑-泼尼松对比美法仑-丙卡巴肼-泼尼松对比阿霉素-泼尼松)分析生存期,未发现任何显著差异。然而,预后与联合化疗的反应密切相关:反应者的中位生存期为72个月,病情改善者为36个月,无反应者为25个月(P < 0.01)。与I-II期患者相比,III期骨髓瘤患者的反应发生率较低。本研究中使用的骨髓瘤分期系统易于应用,在评估治疗结果时能够识别真正具有可比性的患者组。我们的治疗结果证实了美法仑加泼尼松的有效性,且未显示阿霉素作为一线治疗有任何优势。

相似文献

1
Clinical staging and therapeutic results in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的临床分期及治疗结果
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983 Oct;19(10):1353-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(93)90003-n.
2
Lack of correlation between objective response and death rate in multiple myeloma patients treated with oral melphalan and prednisone.
Ann Oncol. 1991 Mar;2(3):191-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057902.
3
[Combination chemotherapy with vincristine, melphalan, CCNA, cyclophosphamide, prednisone in myeloma].
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1984 May;51(5):263-7.
4
Melphalan and prednisone (MP) versus vincristine, BCNU, adriamycin, melphalan and dexamethasone (VBAMDex) therapy for multiple myeloma. Early results of a multicenter trial. The German Myeloma Treatment Group.
Onkologie. 1990 Feb;13(1):43-4. doi: 10.1159/000216718.
5
Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma.硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松与美法仑-泼尼松治疗既往未经治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的持续总生存获益和不增加第二恶性肿瘤风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 1;31(4):448-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.6180. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
6
Initial treatment in multiple myeloma: no advantage of multidrug chemotherapy over melphalan-prednisone. The Myeloma Group of Western Sweden.多发性骨髓瘤的初始治疗:多药化疗并不优于美法仑-泼尼松。瑞典西部骨髓瘤研究组。
Br J Haematol. 1990 Feb;74(2):185-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1990.tb02564.x.
7
Intermittent high-dose melphalan/prednisone vs continuous low-dose melphalan treatment in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤中,间歇性大剂量美法仑/泼尼松与持续性小剂量美法仑治疗的对比
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983 Apr;19(4):499-506. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(83)90113-x.
8
Melphalan and prednisone (MP) versus vincristine, BCNU, adriamycin, melphalan and dexamethasone (VBAM Dex) induction chemotherapy and interferon maintenance treatment in multiple myeloma. Current results of a multicenter trial. The German Myeloma Treatment Group.美法仑与泼尼松(MP)对比长春新碱、卡莫司汀、阿霉素、美法仑及地塞米松(VBAM Dex)诱导化疗并联合干扰素维持治疗多发性骨髓瘤。一项多中心试验的当前结果。德国骨髓瘤治疗组
Onkologie. 1990 Dec;13(6):458-60. doi: 10.1159/000216820.
9
Oral versus intravenous melphalan and prednisone treatment in multiple myeloma stage II. A randomized study from the Myeloma Group of Central Sweden.多发性骨髓瘤II期口服与静脉注射美法仑及泼尼松治疗的比较。瑞典中部骨髓瘤研究组的一项随机研究。
Acta Oncol. 1990;29(6):727-31. doi: 10.3109/02841869009092991.
10
Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 trial.美法仑、泼尼松联合沙利度胺治疗75岁以上新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效:IFM 01/01试验
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 1;27(22):3664-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.0948. Epub 2009 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple myeloma in Korea--clinical analysis and treatment results in 61 cases.韩国的多发性骨髓瘤——61例临床分析与治疗结果
Korean J Intern Med. 1987 Jan;2(1):120-4. doi: 10.3904/kjim.1987.2.1.120.