• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A small-group instruction experiment in medical education.

作者信息

Brinton D A, Jarvis J Q, Harris D L

出版信息

J Med Educ. 1984 Jan;59(1):13-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198401000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-198401000-00003
PMID:6690693
Abstract

The authors challenge the assumption that the passive lecture-based curriculum that dominates most preclinical medical education optimizes learning for all students. For this reason, an experiment was conducted in which medical students were given the option of taking some courses as small groups in a Socratic format rather than in lectures; 67 percent of the students applied for the small-group option. Personality factors, measured by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, were used to determine whether there was any correlation between learning preferences and personality types. Most of the students preferred having more opportunities for small-group instruction. Most students and faculty members found the experience profitable; a significantly greater proportion of students of the intuitive-feeling personality type reacted positively to the experience than did other personality types. The small-group classes required more faculty time than did lectures, and this often prevented faculty support of the Socratic approach.

摘要

相似文献

1
A small-group instruction experiment in medical education.
J Med Educ. 1984 Jan;59(1):13-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198401000-00003.
2
Personality preference distribution of dental students admitted to one dental school using different selection methods.一所口腔医学院招生采用不同选才方法学生的人格偏好分布。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Apr;78(4):580-8.
3
Personality preference influences medical student use of specific computer-aided instruction (CAI).性格偏好会影响医学生对特定计算机辅助教学(CAI)的使用。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Feb 1;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-7.
4
Exploring medical student learning in the large group teaching environment: examining current practice to inform curricular development.探索大班教学环境下医学生的学习情况:审视当前实践以指导课程发展。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 19;16:184. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0698-x.
5
Influence of a highly focused case on the effect of small-group facilitators' content expertise on students' learning and satisfaction.一个高度聚焦的案例对小组促进者的内容专业知识对学生学习和满意度的影响。
Acad Med. 1994 Aug;69(8):663-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199408000-00016.
6
Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach.人体解剖学:让学生告诉我们怎么教。
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Jul-Aug;7(4):262-72. doi: 10.1002/ase.1424. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708.一项比较数字授课和现场授课形式的随机试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN40455708]
BMC Med Educ. 2004 Nov 29;4:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-4-27.
8
Matching student personality types and learning preferences to teaching methodologies.将学生的性格类型和学习偏好与教学方法相匹配。
J Dent Educ. 2006 Jun;70(6):644-51.
9
Commentary: IDSA guidelines for improving the teaching of preclinical medical microbiology and infectious diseases.述评:IDSA 指南提高临床前医学微生物学和传染病教学。
Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c485c5.
10
Lectures in medical educaton: what students think?医学教育讲座:学生怎么看?
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014 Jan-Mar;26(1):21-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of personal character on the results of clinical performance skill tests.个人性格对临床操作技能测试结果的影响。
Korean J Med Educ. 2011 Jun;23(2):111-7. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2011.23.2.111. Epub 2011 Jun 30.