McNulty John A, Espiritu Baltazar, Halsey Martha, Mendez Michelle
Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Feb 1;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-7.
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that personality preference, which can be related to learning style, influences individual utilization of CAI applications developed specifically for the undergraduate medical curriculum.
Personality preferences of students were obtained using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) test. CAI utilization for individual students was collected from entry logs for two different web-based applications (a discussion forum and a tutorial) used in the basic science course on human anatomy. Individual login data were sorted by personality preference and the data statistically analyzed by 2-way mixed ANOVA and correlation.
There was a wide discrepancy in the level and pattern of student use of both CAI. Although individual use of both CAI was positively correlated irrespective of MBTI preference, students with a "Sensing" preference tended to use both CAI applications more than the "iNtuitives". Differences in the level of use of these CAI applications (i.e., higher use of discussion forum vs. a tutorial) were also found for the "Perceiving/Judging" dimension.
We conclude that personality/learning preferences of individual students influence their use of CAI in the medical curriculum.
本研究的目的是检验一种假设,即与学习风格相关的人格偏好会影响专门为本科医学课程开发的计算机辅助教学(CAI)应用程序的个人使用情况。
使用迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)测试获取学生的人格偏好。从人体解剖学基础科学课程中使用的两个不同的基于网络的应用程序(一个讨论论坛和一个教程)的登录日志中收集学生个人的CAI使用情况。按人格偏好对个人登录数据进行分类,并通过双向混合方差分析和相关性分析对数据进行统计分析。
学生对两种CAI的使用水平和模式存在很大差异。尽管无论MBTI偏好如何,个人对两种CAI的使用都呈正相关,但具有“感觉”偏好的学生往往比“直觉型”学生更多地使用这两种CAI应用程序。在“感知/判断”维度上,也发现了这些CAI应用程序使用水平的差异(即讨论论坛的使用高于教程)。
我们得出结论,个体学生的人格/学习偏好会影响他们在医学课程中对CAI的使用。