Podoshin L, Kremer M, Fradis M, Feiglin H
Laryngoscope. 1984 Jan;94(1):113-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.5540940121.
We examined 114 patients aged 10 to 91 years with different kinds of hearing aids fitted in one ear only, the unaided ear acting as a control. They were re-examined several times during a period of follow-up from 1 to 9 years comparing the relative change in hearing due to hearing aid usage with various degrees of amplification of the aid. We compared the degree of hearing loss in the aided and unaided ear looking for evidence of a possible change in hearing related to the frequency of hearing aid usage in hours per day and in years, the maximum power output (MPO) and the gain of the aid. According to our findings there is no change in hearing between the aided and the unaided ear at the alpha = 0.05 probability level at least for 8 years. There is no effect of the long-term amplification of the hearing aid on deterioration of hearing comparing the aided ear and the unaided ear, but with high MPO of the aid, the patient should be followed up more frequently than with low MPO amplification.
我们对114名年龄在10至91岁之间的患者进行了检查,这些患者仅在一只耳朵上佩戴了不同类型的助听器,未佩戴助听器的耳朵作为对照。在1至9年的随访期间,他们接受了多次重新检查,比较了因使用助听器以及不同程度的助听器放大作用而导致的听力相对变化。我们比较了佩戴助听器和未佩戴助听器耳朵的听力损失程度,以寻找与每天使用助听器的时长、使用年限、最大输出功率(MPO)以及助听器增益相关的听力可能变化的证据。根据我们的研究结果,至少在8年时间里,在α = 0.05的概率水平下,佩戴助听器和未佩戴助听器的耳朵之间听力没有变化。比较佩戴助听器的耳朵和未佩戴助听器的耳朵,助听器的长期放大作用对听力衰退没有影响,但对于MPO较高的助听器,相比于MPO较低的放大情况,对患者的随访应更频繁。