Weintraub W S, Hattori S, Akizuki S, Agarwal J B, Bodenheimer M M, Banka V S, Helfant R H
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Feb;3(2 Pt 1):334-40. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80017-0.
Vasodilators have been found effective in increasing blood flow in the lateral border surrounding a central zone of infarction, but any change in blood flow to this border zone may be to the normal tissue in this zone, rather than to the ischemic tissue. In this study of the effects of nifedipine on collateral blood flow, 31 open chest dogs underwent coronary occlusion followed by nifedipine infusion, either 3 or 1 microgram/kg per min. A balloon perfusion microsphere labeling device was used to separate the influence of normally perfused tissue overlapping with ischemic tissue in the lateral border zone. Nifedipine increased blood flow in the border zone, but this increase could be accounted for by the effect of nifedipine on admixed normal tissue. In the central ischemic zone, nifedipine administration resulted in a decrease in collateral blood flow. Thus, to fully understand the effect of a vasodilator on ischemic zone blood flow, it is necessary to account for flow in overlapping normal tissue.
已发现血管扩张剂能有效增加梗死中心区周围侧支血流,但该侧支血流的任何变化可能是流向该区域的正常组织,而非缺血组织。在这项关于硝苯地平对侧支血流影响的研究中,31只开胸犬先进行冠状动脉闭塞,然后以每分钟3或1微克/千克的速度输注硝苯地平。使用球囊灌注微球标记装置来区分正常灌注组织与侧支边缘区缺血组织重叠所产生的影响。硝苯地平增加了边缘区的血流,但这种增加可归因于硝苯地平对混合正常组织的作用。在中央缺血区,给予硝苯地平导致侧支血流减少。因此,要充分了解血管扩张剂对缺血区血流的影响,有必要考虑重叠正常组织中的血流情况。