Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停和复苏期间持续腹部捆绑的血流动力学效应

Hemodynamic effects of continuous abdominal binding during cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

作者信息

Niemann J T, Rosborough J P, Ung S, Criley J M

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 15;53(2):269-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90438-7.

Abstract

Abdominal binding improves arterial pressure and flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study was undertaken to assess the mechanisms of improved hemodynamics during cardiac arrest and CPR with continuous abdominal binding in a canine model (n = 8). Carotid and inferior vena caval (IVC) flow probes and cineangiography were used to observe magnitude and direction of blood flow. CPR with binding significantly increased (p less than 0.001) systolic aortic (Ao) (49 +/- 11 vs 34 +/- 12 mm Hg), right atrial (RA) (49 +/- 11 vs 31 +/- 10 mm Hg) and IVC pressure (50 +/- 7 versus 31 +/- 11 mm Hg) and common carotid flow (1.1 +/- 0.4 vs 0.7 +/- 0.4 ml/min/kg, p less than 0.05) compared with CPR without binding. Aortic, RA and IVC diastolic pressures increased similarly. Binding decreased the diastolic Ao-IVC pressure difference by 8 +/- 12 mm Hg and decreased net IVC flow (0.5 +/- 1.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.2 ml/min/kg, p less than 0.05). Binding also decreased coronary perfusion pressure (Ao-RA) in 5 of 8 dogs. Cineangiograms showed tricuspid incompetence and reflux from the right atrium to the inferior vena cava during chest compression and IVC-to-right heart inflow during relaxation, which was confirmed by the flowmeter data. Abdominal binding during CPR decreased the size of the perfused vascular bed by inhibiting subdiaphragmatic flow and increased intrathoracic pressure for a given chest compression force, leading to preferential cephalad flow. However, coronary perfusion pressure was often adversely affected. Further studies should be undertaken before the widespread clinical application of continuous abdominal binding during CPR.

摘要

腹部捆绑在心肺复苏(CPR)过程中可提高动脉压和血流量。本研究旨在评估在犬模型(n = 8)中,持续腹部捆绑在心脏骤停和CPR期间改善血流动力学的机制。使用颈动脉和下腔静脉(IVC)血流探头以及血管造影术来观察血流的大小和方向。与未进行捆绑的CPR相比,进行捆绑的CPR显著提高了(p < 0.001)主动脉收缩压(Ao)(49 ± 11 vs 34 ± 12 mmHg)、右心房(RA)压(49 ± 11 vs 31 ± 10 mmHg)和IVC压力(50 ± 7对31 ± 11 mmHg)以及颈总动脉血流量(1.1 ± 0.4 vs 0.7 ± 0.4 ml/min/kg,p < 0.05)。主动脉、RA和IVC舒张压也有类似升高。捆绑使舒张期Ao-IVC压差降低了8 ± 12 mmHg,并使IVC净血流量减少(0.5 ± 1.4 vs 1.4 ± 1.2 ml/min/kg,p < 0.05)。在8只犬中有5只,捆绑还降低了冠状动脉灌注压(Ao-RA)。血管造影显示,在胸部按压期间三尖瓣关闭不全以及血液从右心房反流至下腔静脉,而在放松期间IVC血液流入右心,这一点得到了流量计数据的证实。CPR期间腹部捆绑通过抑制膈下血流减少了灌注血管床的大小,并在给定的胸部按压力量下增加了胸腔内压力,从而导致血液优先向头侧流动。然而,冠状动脉灌注压常常受到不利影响。在CPR期间广泛临床应用持续腹部捆绑之前,应进行进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验