Lynch N T, Grunert B K, Vasudevan S V, Severson R A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 Feb;65(2):98-100.
Despite long-standing claims that the conditioning method of treating enuresis is based on the classic conditioning paradigm, research explicitly investigating this claim has been limited. This study compares two conditioning methods of treating enuresis, both using the bell and pad, one in a classic conditioning paradigm and the other in an operant paradigm with an unconditioned stimulus delay of 3 minutes together with an operant reinforcement for wet or dry behavior. Sixty children were randomly assigned to one of the 2 treatment groups or a control group. Using Dunn's procedure, a planned comparison showed the control group and delay group did not differ significantly, but both differed significantly from the classic conditioning group (p less than 0.05). Fifty percent of the classic conditioning group reached criterion of 14 consecutive dry nights while 17% of the delay group reached criterion. None of the control group reached criterion. Results suggest that the operant procedures are a much weaker form of treatment than the bell and pad. This study indicates that enuresis in children can be successfully managed with a short duration outpatient program.
尽管长期以来一直声称治疗遗尿症的条件反射方法是基于经典条件反射范式,但明确研究这一说法的研究却很有限。本研究比较了两种治疗遗尿症的条件反射方法,均使用铃铛和尿垫,一种采用经典条件反射范式,另一种采用操作性范式,无条件刺激延迟3分钟,并对尿床或干爽行为给予操作性强化。60名儿童被随机分配到两个治疗组之一或一个对照组。使用邓恩程序进行的计划比较显示,对照组和延迟组没有显著差异,但两者与经典条件反射组均有显著差异(p小于0.05)。经典条件反射组中有50%达到了连续14个干爽夜晚的标准,而延迟组中有17%达到了标准。对照组中无人达到标准。结果表明,操作性程序作为一种治疗方式比铃铛和尿垫疗法效果差得多。本研究表明,儿童遗尿症可以通过短期门诊治疗方案成功治愈。