Suppr超能文献

海马体损伤会破坏鸽子的识别记忆。

Hippocampal lesions disrupt recognition memory in pigeons.

作者信息

Sahgal A

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 1984 Jan;11(1):47-58. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(84)90007-x.

Abstract

Pigeons given bilateral hippocampal lesions, together with sham-operated and normal birds, were trained on a Konorski pair comparison (recognition memory) task. In this paradigm, the subject must indicate whether or not two successively presented stimuli were identical, or dissimilar; a delay may be interposed between the presentations. All subjects learned the basic (simultaneous, or no delay pair comparison) task to similar levels of performance, indicating that neither perceptual nor general cognitive abilities were selectively impaired. However, the hippocampal group was impaired when delays were interposed, i.e. when (labile) memory was required. These subjects tolerated only short delays, and lost information('forgot') at faster rates. A second experiment explored (a) the importance of acquisitional variables by limiting exposure to the to-be-remembered stimulus (S1), and (b) the role of proactive interference, by varying the inter-trial-interval (ITI). Neither manipulation selectively disrupted the hippocampal group, although reductions in S1 and ITI duration progressively impaired performance in all groups. It is concluded that the avian and mammalian hippocampii are functionally similar, at least with respect to recognition memory processing. The results are discussed in terms of the hypothesis proposed by Olton et al., that hippocampal lesions impair working, but not reference, memory probably by disrupting a process analogous to storage.

摘要

给双侧海马体损伤的鸽子,以及假手术和正常的鸽子,进行科诺尔斯基配对比较(识别记忆)任务训练。在这个范式中,受试者必须指出两个相继呈现的刺激是相同还是不同;两次呈现之间可能会有延迟。所有受试者都将基本(同时或无延迟配对比较)任务学到了相似的表现水平,这表明感知能力和一般认知能力都没有受到选择性损害。然而,当插入延迟时,即需要(不稳定的)记忆时,海马体损伤组受到了损害。这些受试者只能耐受短时间延迟,并以更快的速度丢失信息(“遗忘”)。第二个实验探讨了:(a)通过限制对要记忆的刺激(S1)的暴露来研究习得变量的重要性,以及(b)通过改变试验间隔时间(ITI)来研究前摄干扰的作用。尽管S1和ITI持续时间的缩短会逐渐损害所有组的表现,但这两种操作都没有选择性地干扰海马体损伤组。得出的结论是,鸟类和哺乳动物的海马体在功能上是相似的,至少在识别记忆处理方面是这样。根据奥尔顿等人提出的假设对结果进行了讨论,即海马体损伤可能通过破坏类似于存储的过程来损害工作记忆,但不损害参考记忆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验