Silva P A, McGee R, Williams S
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1984 Feb;5(1):1-5.
A large sample of children (n = 850) from Dunedin, New Zealand, were classified into three groups, preterm (n = 31), small for gestational age (SGA; n = 71), and full-term, normal birth weight (n = 748). These groups were compared on intelligence measures taken at ages 3, 5, 7, and 9 years of age and parent and teacher behavior reports at 5, 7, and 9 years. The SGA group but not the preterm group had significantly lower IQ scores than the normal birth weight children. In addition, the mothers of the SGA children reported more behavior problems. These differences were not attributable to socioeconomic disadvantage in the SGA group. The results suggest "it is better to be born too early than too small."
来自新西兰达尼丁的一大群儿童(n = 850)被分为三组:早产组(n = 31)、小于胎龄儿组(SGA;n = 71)和足月正常出生体重组(n = 748)。对这些组在3岁、5岁、7岁和9岁时进行的智力测试以及在5岁、7岁和9岁时家长和教师的行为报告进行了比较。小于胎龄儿组而非早产组的智商得分显著低于正常出生体重儿童。此外,小于胎龄儿的母亲报告的行为问题更多。这些差异并非归因于小于胎龄儿组的社会经济劣势。结果表明“早出生比出生时体重过轻要好”。