Kraus N, Ozdamar O, Stein L, Reed N
Laryngoscope. 1984 Mar;94(3):400-6. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198403000-00019.
Interpretation of auditory brain stem response (ABR) findings can be problematic in cases where waves III and V are absent. Such findings can be attributed to profound hearing loss, brain stem neuropathology, or both. Over a 3-year period, 48 patients with no known brain stem damage and on whom audiologic data were available were found to have no response by ABR or absent waves III and V. Severe to profound hearing loss was documented in 38 cases, audiometric data were equivocal in 3 cases, and 7 patients showed pure tone sensitivity ranging from normal hearing to moderate impairment. Thus 15% had better hearing sensitivity than might have been expected from their ABR findings. Each of these patients also exhibited abnormal acoustic reflex findings. We report the electrophysiological (ABR, MLR, acoustic reflex), medical (history, neurological, EEG, CT scan) and behavioral (audiometric, speech and language, learning disabilities, psychological) data which characterize this group of patients.
在听性脑干反应(ABR)中,当III波和V波缺失时,其结果的解读可能会出现问题。此类结果可能归因于重度听力损失、脑干神经病理学病变或两者皆有。在三年期间,对48例无已知脑干损伤且有听力学数据的患者进行ABR检测,发现其中无反应或III波和V波缺失。38例患者记录为重度至极重度听力损失,3例患者的听力测定数据不明确,7例患者的纯音敏感度范围从正常听力到中度损伤。因此,15%的患者听力敏感度比根据其ABR结果预期的要好。这些患者均表现出异常的声反射结果。我们报告了表征这组患者的电生理(ABR、MLR、声反射)、医学(病史、神经学、脑电图、CT扫描)和行为(听力测定、言语和语言、学习障碍、心理学)数据。