Slinker B K, Campbell K B, Ringo J A, Klavano P A, Robinette J D, Alexander J E
Am J Physiol. 1984 Mar;246(3 Pt 2):H435-47. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1984.246.3.H435.
To better define beat-to-beat regulation of stroke volume (SV), the several-beat transient response of the left ventricle (LV) to sudden changes in hydraulic loading impedance was studied. Data were collected from eight canine isolated heart-lung preparations with controlled LV loading impedance. At a selected diastolic interval, a sudden increase in hydraulic loading resistance was induced. The resulting transient response in SV, end-diastolic pressure (EDP), and end-systolic pressure (ESP) was analyzed by comparing the relative predictive capability of six competing models, each incorporating different degrees of complexity in the relationship between SV and EDP and ESP. The basic model assumed linear LV pressure-volume relationships at both end diastole and end systole. Incorporation of nonlinear, end-state interaction or coronary perfusion pressure effects into the basic model did not improve predictive performance. Models incorporating SV and ESP of the preceding beat as well as ejecting beat ESP and EDP were consistently superior to all other models. The ranking of the relative influence of the determinants of SV was 1) ejecting beat ESP, 2) preceding beat ESP, 3) ejecting beat EDP, and 4) preceding beat SV.
为了更好地定义每搏输出量(SV)的逐搏调节,研究了左心室(LV)对液压负荷阻抗突然变化的几个心动周期的瞬态反应。数据采集自八只具有可控左心室负荷阻抗的犬离体心肺标本。在选定的舒张间期,诱发液压负荷阻力突然增加。通过比较六个竞争模型的相对预测能力,分析了SV、舒张末期压力(EDP)和收缩末期压力(ESP)的瞬态反应,每个模型在SV与EDP和ESP之间的关系中包含不同程度的复杂性。基本模型假设在舒张末期和收缩末期左心室压力-容积关系均为线性。将非线性、终末状态相互作用或冠状动脉灌注压力效应纳入基本模型并不能提高预测性能。纳入前一心动周期的SV和ESP以及当前心动周期的ESP和EDP的模型始终优于所有其他模型。SV决定因素的相对影响排名为:1)当前心动周期ESP,2)前一心动周期ESP,3)当前心动周期EDP,4)前一心动周期SV。