Suppr超能文献

大肠和直肠大型无蒂息肉的圈套器逐块切除:是否足够?

Piecemeal snare excision of large sessile colon and rectal polyps: is it adequate?

作者信息

Nivatvongs S, Snover D C, Fang D T

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1984 Feb;30(1):18-20. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(84)72287-5.

Abstract

This study analyzes 28 consecutive patients with large sessile polyps snared piecemeal from the colon and rectum. The sections were examined to determine the adequacy of orientation and margin of excision. Orientation was judged excellent in five, good in 12, fair in six, and poor in five cases. The margin of excision was judged adequate in 23 of 28 cases. Five of eight patients with invasive carcinoma underwent bowel resection, and no residual tumor was found in the resected specimens. Of the remaining 20 patients without carcinoma, five had residual tumor or recurrences, with follow-up from 6 months to 6 years (average, 18 months). All of them underwent rebiopsies and electrocoagulation. None of the residual tumor or recurrences showed evidence of malignancy. Piecemeal snare excision of large sessile polyps of the large bowel appears to be an adequate procedure for most patients. A close follow-up with colonoscopy or proctoscopy is essential because residual tumor or recurrences are common.

摘要

本研究分析了28例连续的患者,这些患者的大肠(结肠和直肠)广基大息肉通过圈套器分块切除。对切片进行检查以确定定位是否准确以及切除切缘是否足够。定位被判定为优的有5例,良的有12例,尚可的有6例,差的有5例。28例中有23例的切除切缘被判定为足够。8例浸润性癌患者中有5例行肠切除术,切除标本中未发现残留肿瘤。其余20例无癌患者中,5例有残留肿瘤或复发,随访时间为6个月至6年(平均18个月)。他们均接受了再次活检和电凝治疗。所有残留肿瘤或复发均未显示恶性证据。大肠广基大息肉的圈套器分块切除对大多数患者似乎是一种合适的手术方式。由于残留肿瘤或复发很常见,因此通过结肠镜或直肠镜进行密切随访至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验