Beall M, Eglinton G S, Clark S L, Phelan J P
J Reprod Med. 1984 Jan;29(1):31-5.
Documentation of a prior cesarean and the type of uterine scar has been used as one criterion for permitting patients a trial of labor. In a highly mobile patient population such as ours, these medical facts are often difficult or impossible to obtain. As a result, we retrospectively examined the performance of patients with unknown types of cesarean scar and found no difference between them and a similar population with documented low cervical scars. Although obtaining an old record is useful, its absence probably should not interdict a trial of labor in a patient who desires to attempt vaginal delivery.
既往剖宫产的记录以及子宫瘢痕的类型已被用作允许患者进行试产的一项标准。在像我们这样流动性很大的患者群体中,这些医学事实往往很难或无法获取。因此,我们回顾性地研究了剖宫产瘢痕类型不明的患者的情况,发现他们与有记录显示为低宫颈瘢痕的类似人群之间没有差异。虽然获取旧记录是有用的,但在渴望尝试阴道分娩的患者中,没有旧记录可能不应妨碍其进行试产。