Collins S M, Skorton D J, Geiser E A, Nichols J A, Conetta D A, Pandian N G, Kerber R E
Am J Cardiol. 1984 May 1;53(9):1380-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90098-5.
Four methods of computer-based edge detection were evaluated for identification of endocardial and epicardial borders on 2-dimensional echocardiograms of excised hearts. A method was also evaluated for observer identification of cardiac borders in the same hearts. The accuracy of computer-derived borders and of observer-derived borders were determined by comparison to anatomic borders measured from photographs of slices of the excised hearts. Echocardiographic borders were compared with anatomic borders by calculation of segmental cavity areas and wall thickness. Each of the methods tested (computer and observer) identified endocardial borders accurately, resulting in cavity segment areas that correlated well with the corresponding anatomic data (r = 0.90 to 0.92). Regional wall thicknesses correlated less well with anatomic data (r = 0.74 to 0.80), suggesting that endocardial borders were identified more accurately than were epicardial borders. Thus, the methods of computer-assisted echocardiographic border detection tested identified the endocardium and epicardium as accurately as a trained observer evaluating unprocessed echocardiograms. Computer-based methods of border detection may be useful in the automated analysis of clinical echocardiograms.
