O'Malley T A, O'Malley H C, Everitt D E, Sarson D
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984 May;32(5):362-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1984.tb02041.x.
The records of 22 cases of family-mediated abuse and neglect of elderly persons were retrospectively reviewed by the physician and nurse responsible for their care using a modification of the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment form. Cases were divided into three categories: Category I cases (n = 4) involved extremely impaired elders who received extensive care from the individuals responsible for the abuse or neglect. Category II cases (n = 9) involved impaired elders who received inadequate or intermittent care. Category III cases (n = 9) involved independent elders whose only care needs resulted from threats or violence from relatives. Among the statistically significant differences found between these categories were the age of the abuser, the manifestations of abuse or neglect, the interventions offered, the durations of abuse, and the outcomes of the cases. The results suggest that these three categories represent different subgroups of abused and neglected elderly persons, all with different implications for identification, intervention, and outcome.
负责照顾22名遭受家庭虐待和忽视的老年人的医生和护士,使用修改后的OARS多维功能评估表对这些病例记录进行了回顾性审查。病例分为三类:第一类病例(n = 4)涉及极度受损的老年人,他们受到了实施虐待或忽视行为者的大量照料。第二类病例(n = 9)涉及受损但照料不足或间断的老年人。第三类病例(n = 9)涉及独立的老年人,他们唯一的照料需求源于亲属的威胁或暴力行为。在这些类别之间发现的具有统计学意义的差异包括施虐者的年龄、虐待或忽视的表现形式、提供的干预措施、虐待持续时间以及病例结果。结果表明,这三类代表了受虐待和被忽视老年人的不同亚组,对识别、干预和结果均有不同的影响。