Yumoto E, Sasaki Y, Okamura H
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Mar;27(1):2-6. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2701.02.
The degree of hoarseness can be evaluated by judging the extent to which noise replaces the harmonic structure in the spectrogram . The relationship between these two components was quantified as the harmonics-to-noise (H/N) ratio. Eighty-seven phonatory samples (sustained vowel /a/), ranging from nearly normal to severely hoarse, were analyzed. The H/N ratio, the spectrographic classification, and cycle-to-cycle pitch perturbations (jitter) each showed a significant correlation with the psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness (r = .809, .805, and .712, respectively; p less than .001). The analysis also revealed that the correlations of the psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness with the first two parameters were significantly higher than that with jitter (p less than .05). Moreover, the spectrographic classification is subjective, and its scale is discrete and coarse. Therefore, the H/N ratio seems to be the most applicable in the clinic as a quantitative index of the degree of hoarseness.
可以通过判断噪声在声谱图中取代谐波结构的程度来评估声音嘶哑的程度。这两个成分之间的关系被量化为谐波与噪声(H/N)比。分析了87个发声样本(持续元音/a/),范围从接近正常到严重嘶哑。H/N比、声谱分类和逐周期音高扰动(抖动)均与声音嘶哑程度的心理物理学测量显示出显著相关性(分别为r = 0.809、0.805和0.712;p小于0.001)。分析还表明,声音嘶哑程度的心理物理学测量与前两个参数的相关性显著高于与抖动的相关性(p小于0.05)。此外,声谱分类是主观的,其量表是离散且粗略的。因此,H/N比似乎是临床上最适用于作为声音嘶哑程度的定量指标。