• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用哈伯德水箱与标准水箱进行水下称重。

Underwater weighing using the Hubbard tank vs the standard tank.

作者信息

Williams D, Anderson T, Currier D

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1984 May;64(5):658-64. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.5.658.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/64.5.658
PMID:6718495
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether underwater weighing in the Hubbard tank is a valid and reliable method for estimating body composition. Thirty healthy subjects were weighed underwater for four separate trials; each trial consisted of five weighings. The first trial was completed in a standardized sit-in underwater weighing tank, and the last three trials were completed in a Hubbard tank. Validity was determined by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient across the four underwater trials, which resulted in r = .077 or higher. The coefficient of variation was found to be 1.22 percent for the sit-in tank and 1.23 percent for the Hubbard tank. A paired t test between the two methods was significant at the .001 level. Reliability for the Hubbard tank method was determined by the repeated measures analysis of variance across the three trials and found not to be significant. The intraclass correlation for the three Hubbard tank trials resulted in R = .997. In addition, the interrater reliability between the two researchers who made independent observations of the weight scale resulted in r = .999 for the standardized sit-in tank and r = .998 for the Hubbard tank. Therefore, the Hubbard tank appears to be valid, reliable, and equally effective as the standardized sit-in underwater weighing tank for determining body composition. Because the paired t test was significant, however, the two methods should not be interchanged; one or the other method should be used, but not both.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定在哈伯德水槽中进行水下称重是否是一种有效且可靠的估计身体成分的方法。30名健康受试者在水下进行了四次独立试验;每次试验包括五次称重。第一次试验在标准化的坐式水下称重水槽中完成,后三次试验在哈伯德水槽中完成。通过计算四次水下试验的皮尔逊相关系数来确定有效性,结果r = 0.077或更高。发现坐式水槽的变异系数为1.22%,哈伯德水槽的变异系数为1.23%。两种方法之间的配对t检验在0.001水平上具有显著性。哈伯德水槽法的可靠性通过对三次试验的重复测量方差分析来确定,结果发现不具有显著性。三次哈伯德水槽试验的组内相关系数R = 0.997。此外,对体重秤进行独立观察的两位研究人员之间的评分者间信度,标准化坐式水槽的r = 0.999,哈伯德水槽的r = 0.998。因此,对于确定身体成分,哈伯德水槽似乎是有效、可靠的,并且与标准化坐式水下称重水槽同样有效。然而,由于配对t检验具有显著性,两种方法不应互换使用;应使用其中一种方法,但不能同时使用两种方法。

相似文献

1
Underwater weighing using the Hubbard tank vs the standard tank.使用哈伯德水箱与标准水箱进行水下称重。
Phys Ther. 1984 May;64(5):658-64. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.5.658.
2
A simple inexpensive method for estimating underwater weight.一种简单且低成本的水下称重估算方法。
Br J Sports Med. 1978 Mar;12(1):33-6.
3
A hydrostatic weighing method using total lung capacity and a small tank.一种使用肺总量和小型水箱的水下称重法。
Br J Sports Med. 1986 Mar;20(1):17-21. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.20.1.17.
4
An automated real time underwater weighing system.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Mar;26(3):383-91.
5
Hydrostatic weights of patients with spinal injury. Reliability of measurements in standard sit-in and Hubbard tanks.脊髓损伤患者的静水重量。标准坐式浴盆和哈伯德浴槽中测量的可靠性。
Phys Ther. 1987 Jun;67(6):921-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.6.921.
6
Validity and reliability of body composition assessed by the sulphur hexafluoride dilution method.
J Sports Sci. 2002 Sep;20(9):663-70. doi: 10.1080/026404102320219365.
7
A comparison of body fat determined by underwater weighing and volume displacement.
Am J Physiol. 1978 Jan;234(1):E94-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1978.234.1.E94.
8
An inexpensive method of determining body composition by underwater weighing.一种通过水下称重来测定身体成分的低成本方法。
Br J Sports Med. 1980 Dec;14(4):225-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.14.4.225.
9
Body composition of anorexia nervosa patients assessed by underwater weighing and skinfold-thickness measurements before and after weight gain.通过水下称重和皮褶厚度测量评估的神经性厌食症患者体重增加前后的身体成分。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2):190-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.190.
10
Skinfold thickness measurements in obese subjects.肥胖受试者的皮褶厚度测量
Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Apr;51(4):571-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/51.4.571.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Quantify Body Composition in Patients After Musculoskeletal Trauma.多频生物电阻抗分析用于量化肌肉骨骼创伤后患者身体成分的可靠性。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):75-82.
2
Techniques of measurement of body composition. Part II.身体成分测量技术。第二部分。
Sports Med. 1988 Feb;5(2):74-98. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198805020-00002.