Vanmeenen M T, Ghesquiere J, Demedts M
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1984 Mar-Apr;20(2):127-32.
In eleven young healthy subjects, vital capacity was reduced by 30% by thoracic or abdominal strapping and the effects of this on maximal work capacity, ventilation and circulation were examined. During exercise as well as at rest, tidal volume and stroke volume were reduced and respiratory frequency and heart rate were increased with both types of strapping. Cardiac output appeared to be decreased. Thoracic strapping was slightly but significantly more impeding than abdominal strapping: residual volume, tidal volume and maximal work capacity were smaller. In both instances, the decrease in maximal performance was apparently due to ventilatory as well as circulatory limitation.
在11名年轻健康受试者中,通过胸部或腹部束缚使肺活量降低了30%,并研究了其对最大工作能力、通气和循环的影响。在运动以及休息期间,两种束缚方式均使潮气量和每搏输出量减少,呼吸频率和心率增加。心输出量似乎降低。胸部束缚比腹部束缚的阻碍作用稍大但具有显著差异:残气量、潮气量和最大工作能力较小。在两种情况下,最大运动能力的下降显然是由于通气和循环受限。