• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读障碍儿童与非阅读障碍儿童的信息处理

Information processing in reading-disabled and nondisabled children.

作者信息

Bauer R H, Emhert J

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Apr;37(2):271-81. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90005-5.

DOI:10.1016/0022-0965(84)90005-5
PMID:6726115
Abstract

Reading disabled and nondisabled children (13-14 years of age) were presented lists of 10 words each at different rates (one word per 1, 2, and 4 sec), and immediately after the last word of each list they recalled the words in any order. Recall of the first few words presented from each list (the primacy effect) was lower in reading-disabled than nondisabled children, and slower presentation rates increased the primacy effect in both groups. These findings suggest that reading-disabled children are not completely failing to use elaborative encoding but are using less effective elaborative encoding than nondisabled readers. With all presentation rates, recall of the last few words (the recency effect) was comparable in both groups, suggesting that older reading-disabled children encode and recognize the stimuli and that elaborative encoding is deficient in reading-disabled in spite of adequate stimulus encoding and recognition.

摘要

向阅读障碍儿童和非阅读障碍儿童(13 - 14岁)分别呈现每组包含10个单词的列表,呈现速度不同(每个单词分别以1秒、2秒和4秒的速度呈现),并且在每组列表的最后一个单词呈现后,他们可以以任意顺序回忆这些单词。阅读障碍儿童对每组列表中最初呈现的几个单词(首因效应)的回忆低于非阅读障碍儿童,并且较慢的呈现速度增加了两组儿童的首因效应。这些发现表明,阅读障碍儿童并非完全无法使用精细编码,而是使用的精细编码效果不如非阅读障碍读者。在所有呈现速度下,两组儿童对最后几个单词的回忆(近因效应)相当,这表明年龄较大的阅读障碍儿童能够编码和识别刺激,尽管有足够的刺激编码和识别,但阅读障碍儿童的精细编码仍存在缺陷。

相似文献

1
Information processing in reading-disabled and nondisabled children.阅读障碍儿童与非阅读障碍儿童的信息处理
J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Apr;37(2):271-81. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90005-5.
2
The effect of increased incentive on free recall by learning-disabled and nondisabled children.增加激励对学习障碍儿童和非学习障碍儿童自由回忆的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1990 Oct;117(4):447-61. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1990.9921150.
3
Effects of rehearsal activity and level of word processing on learning disabled and normal readers' free recall.复述活动及字词加工水平对学习障碍读者和正常读者自由回忆的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1983 Jan;108(1st Half):61-72. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1983.9711479.
4
Semantic and visual memory codes in learning disabled readers.学习障碍读者的语义和视觉记忆编码
J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Feb;37(1):124-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90062-6.
5
Naturalistic memory in learning-disabled and skilled readers.学习障碍读者与熟练读者的自然记忆
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Apr;19(2):117-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00909975.
6
Free recall and rehearsal strategies in average and severely disabled readers.普通读者和重度阅读障碍读者的自由回忆与复述策略
Percept Mot Skills. 1981 Apr;52(2):539-45. doi: 10.2466/pms.1981.52.2.539.
7
Hemispheric specialization in learning disabled readers' recall as a function of age and level of processing.学习障碍读者回忆中的半球特化与年龄及加工水平的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1983 Jun;35(3):457-77. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(83)90021-8.
8
What learning-disabled readers fail to retrieve on verbal dichotic tests: a problem of encoding, retrieval, or storage?学习障碍读者在言语双耳分听测试中未能检索到的内容:是编码、检索还是存储的问题?
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1987 Sep;15(3):339-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00916454.
9
Attention factors mediating syntactic deficiency in reading-disabled children.阅读障碍儿童句法缺陷的注意中介因素。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Nov;63(2):386-415. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0055.
10
Comparison of memory skills in learning disabled, low-reading, and nondisabled adolescents.
Percept Mot Skills. 1985 Aug;61(1):191-5. doi: 10.2466/pms.1985.61.1.191.

引用本文的文献

1
The contribution of phonological knowledge, memory, and language background to reading comprehension in deaf populations.语音知识、记忆和语言背景对聋人群体阅读理解的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 25;6:1153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01153. eCollection 2015.
2
What learning-disabled readers fail to retrieve on verbal dichotic tests: a problem of encoding, retrieval, or storage?学习障碍读者在言语双耳分听测试中未能检索到的内容:是编码、检索还是存储的问题?
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1987 Sep;15(3):339-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00916454.