Quay L C, Mathews M, Hough R
J Gen Psychol. 1984 Apr;110(2d Half):267-74. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1984.9709971.
This study evaluated the effects of age, the dyad's attention to and verbal labeling of target and nontarget stimuli, and listener instructions to ask questions on referential communication in 48 five-year-old and 48 eight-year-old dyads. A MANOVA for dyad activities indicated both age and dyad-activities differences. The dyads that located and verbally labeled the critical attributes were superior to the dyads that simply located the critical attributes and to control dyads on speaker performance. A MANOVA for listener instructions to ask questions yielded no age differences on the number of questions asked and no interaction between age and instructions to ask questions. It indicated that listeners instructed to ask questions and control listeners differed on the number of questions asked but not on communication accuracy.
本研究评估了年龄、二元组对目标和非目标刺激的关注及言语标记,以及听众提问指令对48个五岁二元组和48个八岁二元组参照性沟通的影响。对二元组活动进行的多变量方差分析表明了年龄和二元组活动存在差异。定位并对关键属性进行言语标记的二元组在说话者表现方面优于仅定位关键属性的二元组和控制组二元组。对听众提问指令进行的多变量方差分析显示,在提问数量上不存在年龄差异,年龄与提问指令之间也不存在交互作用。这表明,被指示提问的听众和控制组听众在提问数量上存在差异,但在沟通准确性上没有差异。