Morgan T, Gillies A, Morgan G, Adam W
Med J Aust. 1978 Apr 8;1(7):393-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1978.tb107930.x.
Twenty-two hypertensive patients from a large clinic, who were resistant to conventional therapy, were entered into this study. Most patients previously had received beta-blocking drugs, thiazide diuretics, alpha-methyl-dopa, or vasodilator drugs (hydrallazine or prazosin) which failed to control their blood pressure. The therapy with vasodilator drugs was discontinued, and the therapy with labetalol (a drug with both alpha-blocking and beta-blocking effect) was commenced. Subsequently, as the blood pressure came under control, other drugs that the patients were taking were also withdrawn. In 13 of the 22 patients, labetalol enabled the blood pressure to be controlled at acceptable levels. In six patients, the response was not considered to be sufficient to justify continuation of labetalol therapy. In three patients, the drug was withdrawn because of postural hypotension in one patient, intractable diarrhoea in another, and an allergic-type skin rash in the third. In certain patients, postural changes in blood pressure were observed, but this rarely produced symptoms. It is suggested that, if blood pressure control is not achieved with a thiazide diuretic and a beta-blocking drug, then labetalol should be introduced and the beta-blocking drug should be withdrawn.
来自一家大型诊所的22名对传统疗法耐药的高血压患者参与了本研究。大多数患者此前曾接受过β受体阻滞剂、噻嗪类利尿剂、α-甲基多巴或血管扩张剂(肼屈嗪或哌唑嗪)治疗,但这些药物均未能控制他们的血压。停用血管扩张剂治疗,开始使用拉贝洛尔(一种兼具α受体阻滞和β受体阻滞作用的药物)治疗。随后,随着血压得到控制,患者正在服用的其他药物也被停用。22名患者中有13名患者,拉贝洛尔能将血压控制在可接受水平。6名患者的反应被认为不足以支持继续使用拉贝洛尔治疗。3名患者中,1名因体位性低血压、另1名因顽固性腹泻、第3名因过敏性皮疹而停用该药物。在某些患者中,观察到血压的体位变化,但这很少产生症状。建议,如果使用噻嗪类利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂未能实现血压控制,那么应引入拉贝洛尔并停用β受体阻滞剂。