Ensuring the right to minimally adequate habilitation: a proposed role for human rights committees.
作者信息
Reese R M
出版信息
Ment Retard. 1984 Jun;22(3):142-6.
PMID:6727648
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Ensuring the right to minimally adequate habilitation: a proposed role for human rights committees.保障最低限度适足康复权利：人权委员会的拟议作用。
Ment Retard. 1984 Jun;22(3):142-6.
2
Presidential address 1985:Inalienable rights of persons with mental retardation.1985年主席致辞：智力迟钝者的不可剥夺权利。
Ment Retard. 1985 Oct;23(5):219-21.
3
Mentally retarded people and the law: preface.
Stanford Law Rev. 1979 Apr;31(4):541-4.
4
The new clients: legal services for mentally retarded persons.新客户：为智障人士提供法律服务。
Stanford Law Rev. 1979 Apr;31(4):553-611.
5
The President's panel recommendations - today.总统小组的建议——今日发布。
Ment Retard. 1975 Aug;13(4):32-4.
6
Conquest of mental retardation.征服智力迟钝。
Ment Retard. 1988 Oct;26(5):251-5.
7
8
Common sense in the habilitation of mentally retarded persons: a reply to Menolascino and McGee.
Ment Retard. 1981 Oct;19(5):221-5.
9
The silent clients: legal and ethical considerations in representing severely and profoundly retarded individuals.沉默的当事人：代理重度和极重度智障人士的法律与伦理考量
Stanford Law Rev. 1979 Apr;31(4):625-35.
10
The law and mentally retarded people: an uncertain future.法律与智障人士：不确定的未来。
Stanford Law Rev. 1979 Apr;31(4):613-24.
引用本文的文献
1
Applying the least restrictive alternative principle to treatment decisions: A legal and behavioral analysis.将限制最少替代方案原则应用于治疗决策：法律与行为分析。
Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;16(1):103-15. doi: 10.1007/BF03392615.
Zotero 插件