Suppr超能文献

红细胞抗体洗脱方法的定量评估

Quantitative evaluation of elution methods for red cell antibodies.

作者信息

Panzer S, Salama A, Bödeker R H, Mueller-Eckhardt C

出版信息

Vox Sang. 1984;46(5):330-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1984.tb00094.x.

Abstract

Two recent techniques using xylene and chloroform for antibody elution from red blood cells (RBC) were compared with the most widely used ether and heat elution by means of a quantitative 125I-antiglobulin test. Free serum alloantibodies and cell-bound alloantibodies from in vivo sensitization of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions and of hemolytic disease of the newborn as well as autoantibodies in autoimmune hemolytic disease were studied. With alloantibodies, xylene proved more efficient than chloroform (p less than 0.025), while both methods were superior to heat or ether elution (p less than 0.005). Autoantibody elution was equally effective with xylene and chloroform (p less than 0.1) but again better than heat or ether elution (p less than 0.02). However, no single method produced the strongest eluate with all antibodies studied. We conclude that xylene and/or chloroform elution are valuable implementations in RBC serology, but, in selected instances, the classical elution methods will retain their importance.

摘要

通过定量¹²⁵I抗球蛋白试验,将最近使用二甲苯和氯仿从红细胞(RBC)中洗脱抗体的两种技术与最常用的乙醚和热洗脱方法进行了比较。研究了延迟性溶血性输血反应和新生儿溶血病体内致敏产生的游离血清同种抗体和细胞结合同种抗体,以及自身免疫性溶血性疾病中的自身抗体。对于同种抗体,二甲苯比氯仿更有效(p<0.025),而这两种方法均优于热洗脱或乙醚洗脱(p<0.005)。二甲苯和氯仿对自身抗体的洗脱效果相同(p<0.1),但同样优于热洗脱或乙醚洗脱(p<0.02)。然而,没有一种方法能对所有研究的抗体产生最强的洗脱液。我们得出结论,二甲苯和/或氯仿洗脱在RBC血清学中是有价值的方法,但在某些特定情况下,经典的洗脱方法仍将具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验