• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Severe neurological impairment: legal aspects of decisions to reduce care.

作者信息

Beresford H R

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 1984 May;15(5):409-14. doi: 10.1002/ana.410150502.

DOI:10.1002/ana.410150502
PMID:6732188
Abstract

Decisions to reduce care for patients with severe neurological impairment may raise legal questions. The laws of most states now authorize physicians to stop care for those who have suffered irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain ("brain death"). Where state law is not explicit, it is nevertheless probably lawful to regard brain death as death for legal purposes so long as currently accepted criteria are satisfied. Several courts have ruled that it is lawful to reduce care for patients in vegetative states, but have prescribed differing standards and procedures for implementing such decisions. The issue of whether parents can authorize physicians to reduce care for neurologically impaired children is the focus of current litigation. Implicit in this litigation is the question of how severe neurological impairment must be before parents and physicians may lawfully agree to reduce care. For severely impaired but not vegetative adults, there is some legal authority to justify certain decisions to reduce care. The issue of whether withholding feeding from a severely demented patient with life-threatening medical problems constitutes criminal behavior is now being considered by a state supreme court.

摘要

相似文献

1
Severe neurological impairment: legal aspects of decisions to reduce care.
Ann Neurol. 1984 May;15(5):409-14. doi: 10.1002/ana.410150502.
2
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
3
Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).刑法——杀人罪——应家属请求从植物人、昏迷患者身上拔除静脉输液管不构成谋杀。巴伯诉高等法院,加利福尼亚州上诉法院,第147卷,第3期,第1006页,加利福尼亚州 Rptr 第195卷,第484页(1983年)
Cumberland Law Rev. 1984;15(1):225-37.
4
End-of-life decision-making in the United States.
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 2008;42:43-50. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507003419.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
Brain death: medical and legal issues.
J Fam Pract. 1984 Sep;19(3):349-54.
7
Legal issues in neonatal intensive care.新生儿重症监护中的法律问题。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1989 Winter;34(4):578-90.
8
Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?医生的刑事责任:对堕胎权的侵犯?
Am Crim Law Rev. 1981 Spring;18(4):591-615.
9
Medical, legal and ethical issues in critical care.重症监护中的医学、法律和伦理问题。
Crit Care Med. 1982 Jan;10(1):57-61.
10
[Legal problems of brain death].[脑死亡的法律问题]
Nervenarzt. 1985 Aug;56(8):399-403.

引用本文的文献

1
Dementia care in gerontological social work: emerging issues and challenges in Saudi Arabia.老年社会工作中的痴呆症照护:沙特阿拉伯的新问题与挑战。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 8;11:1167856. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1167856. eCollection 2023.
2
What is extraordinary life support?什么是特殊生命支持?
West J Med. 1984 Sep;141(3):358-63.