Comparison of lorcainide and quinidine in the treatment of ventricular ectopy.

Lorcainide, a new type I antiarrhythmic agent, was compared to quinidine in respect to antiarrhythmic efficacy and clinical safety. Thirteen subjects completed an open, randomized, crossover study with analysis of 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and drug blood levels. The QRS and Q-T intervals increased with both lorcainide and quinidine. The mean reduction in total ventricular premature beats (VPBs) with quinidine was 16 percent compared to 68 percent with lorcainide (p less than .05). With lorcainide eight of 13 subjects had a significant (greater than 82 percent) reduction in VPBs compared to only three of 13 subjects taking quinidine (p less than .05). This same relationship was observed when mean VPB/1,000 heartbeats was analyzed. Ventricular tachycardia was no longer present in five of nine subjects taking lorcainide and in two of nine taking quinidine. No relationship could be established between drug level and arrhythmia suppression in this small population. Some CNS effects were reported in both groups, but no significant hematologic, chemical, or urinary adverse effects were seen with either drug. Thus, lorcainide compares favorably to quinidine in regard to arrhythmia suppression, but was limited in its clinical utility by CNS side effects.