Selvin S, Merrill D, Wong L, Sacks S T
Environ Health Perspect. 1984 Mar;54:333-40. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8454333.
This presentation focuses entirely on the use and evaluation of regression analysis applied to ecologic data as a method to study the effects of ambient air pollution on mortality rates. Using extensive national data on mortality, air quality and socio-economic status regression analyses are used to study the influence of air quality on mortality. The analytic methods and data are selected in such a way that direct comparisons can be made with other ecologic regression studies of mortality and air quality. Analyses are performed by use of two types of geographic areas, age-specific mortality of both males and females and three pollutants (total suspended particulates, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide). The overall results indicate no persuasive evidence exists of a link between air quality and general mortality levels. Additionally, a lack of consistency between the present results and previous published work is noted. Overall, it is concluded that linear regression analysis applied to nationally collected ecologic data cannot be used to usefully infer a causal relationship between air quality and mortality which is in direct contradiction to other major published studies.
本报告完全聚焦于将回归分析应用于生态数据的使用和评估,以此作为研究环境空气污染对死亡率影响的一种方法。利用关于死亡率、空气质量和社会经济地位的大量全国性数据,通过回归分析来研究空气质量对死亡率的影响。选择分析方法和数据的方式使得能够与其他关于死亡率和空气质量的生态回归研究进行直接比较。分析是通过使用两种类型的地理区域、男性和女性的年龄特异性死亡率以及三种污染物(总悬浮颗粒物、二氧化硫和二氧化氮)来进行的。总体结果表明,没有确凿证据证明空气质量与总体死亡率水平之间存在联系。此外,还注意到当前结果与先前已发表的研究之间缺乏一致性。总体而言,得出的结论是,应用于全国收集的生态数据的线性回归分析无法有效地推断空气质量与死亡率之间的因果关系,这与其他主要已发表的研究直接矛盾。