Goldstein G, Shelly C
J Clin Neuropsychol. 1984 May;6(2):143-56. doi: 10.1080/01688638408401205.
The study involved a comparison between language tests derived from the Halstead-Reitan and Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological test batteries. Language-related measures from each battery were entered into a factor analysis based on a sample of 150 nonaphasic neuropsychiatric patients. Five factors were extracted and were named Academic Achievement, Basic Skills, Verbal Intelligence, Auditory Discrimination, and Comprehension of Syntactical Relations. Measures from both the Halstead-Reitan and Luria-Nebraska loaded on most of these factors. A canonical correlation analysis revealed a strong relationship between the Halstead-Reitan and Luria-Nebraska measures. However, it was noted that interpretation of this relationship must be qualified by the association found between the measures used and educational achievement.
该研究涉及对源自霍尔斯特德-赖坦和卢里亚-内布拉斯加神经心理测试组的语言测试进行比较。基于150名非失语神经精神患者的样本，将每组测试中与语言相关的测量指标纳入因子分析。提取出五个因子，分别命名为学业成就、基本技能、言语智力、听觉辨别和句法关系理解。霍尔斯特德-赖坦和卢里亚-内布拉斯加测试组的测量指标在这些因子中的大多数上都有载荷。典型相关分析表明，霍尔斯特德-赖坦和卢里亚-内布拉斯加测试组的测量指标之间存在很强的关系。然而，需要注意的是，这种关系的解释必须以所使用的测量指标与教育成就之间的关联为条件。
