Kernan K T, Sabsay S
Monogr Am Assoc Ment Defic (1982). 1984(6):27-41.
We found, not surprisingly, that most nonretarded adults can either give accurate and adequate sets of directions to their places of residence or recognize their inability to do so and refuse to attempt to give any--86% of those in our sample. We found also that this is the case for many mentally retarded adults who reside in the community--45% of those in our sample. These individuals responded in perfectly appropriate ways to a request for directions. However, 55% of the mentally retarded sample gave inaccurate or ineffective directions. Of these, 64% made errors that differed in quantity--both in terms of total number of errors and number of errors per set of directions--but not in kind from the errors made by the nonretarded sample. This leaves 13 mildly mentally retarded individuals--20% of our total sample, 36% of those who gave inaccurate directions--who made errors that were unlike those made by nonretarded adults: errors of communicative competence that involved a lack of knowledge of the structure and function of directions or a lack of ability in communicative design. In our studies of other everyday speech events such as narratives, we have suggested that one of the reasons for the impression interlocutors have that something is different or wrong with the way that mildly mentally retarded persons speak is that although they make the same sorts of errors that nonretarded speakers make, they make them more frequently. Because of the nature of the speech events we have studied, we have been unable to demonstrate this conclusively. However, as we pointed out at the beginning of this paper, the nature of directions is such that one can make objective judgements of accuracy and of type and number of errors. For this speech event at least, our suggestion that mildly mentally retarded speakers make errors that are like those made by nonretarded speakers but make them more frequently, is confirmed. Furthermore, we have found that difficulties with communicative design that are not usually exhibited in the speech of nonretarded persons are present not only in the narratives of mentally retarded speakers but in the directions that they give as well. Traditionally, studies of language and mental retardation have concentrated on subjects' phonological, morphological, lexical, and syntactic deficits. But for the mildly retarded, such deficits are relatively insignificant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
不出所料,我们发现,大多数非智障成年人要么能够准确、充分地指明前往其住所的路线,要么意识到自己无法做到这一点并拒绝尝试指明路线——我们样本中的86%都是如此。我们还发现,许多居住在社区中的智障成年人也是如此——我们样本中的45%。这些人对指明路线的请求做出了完全恰当的回应。然而,55%的智障样本给出了不准确或无效的路线指引。其中,64%的人所犯错误在数量上有所不同——无论是错误总数还是每组路线指引中的错误数量——但与非智障样本所犯错误在类型上并无差异。这就剩下13名轻度智障者——占我们总样本的20%,占给出不准确路线指引者的36%——他们所犯错误与非智障成年人不同:这些沟通能力方面的错误涉及缺乏对路线指引的结构和功能的了解,或者缺乏沟通设计能力。在我们对其他日常言语活动(如叙述)的研究中,我们曾提出,对话者之所以会觉得轻度智障者说话的方式有些不同或不对劲,原因之一在于,尽管他们犯的错误与非智障说话者相同,但犯得更频繁。由于我们所研究的言语活动的性质,我们无法确凿地证明这一点。然而,正如我们在本文开头所指出的,路线指引的性质使得人们能够对准确性以及错误的类型和数量做出客观判断。至少对于这个言语活动来说,我们关于轻度智障说话者犯的错误与非智障说话者相同但更频繁的说法得到了证实。此外,我们发现,非智障者言语中通常不会表现出的沟通设计方面的困难,不仅存在于智障说话者的叙述中,也存在于他们给出的路线指引中。传统上,语言与智力迟钝的研究主要集中在受试者的语音、形态、词汇和句法缺陷上。但对于轻度智障者来说,这些缺陷相对并不重要。(摘要截选至400字)