Caya J G, Clowry L J, Wollenberg N J, Tieu T M
Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jul;82(1):100-3. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/82.1.100.
The authors herein report a series of transthoracic fine-needle aspiration cytology studies performed over a ten-year period at a medical center. The verification criteria they utilized for "positive" and " nonpositive " results are unique to the TFNA literature, as is the authors' detailed analysis of false-negative cases. The authors' statistical findings included specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 79.0%; and overall accuracy, 83.0%. Eleven of 13 false-negative studies (84.6%) were consequent to sampling error; the remaining two cases (both "suspects") were the result of cytopathologist judgment error. In those patients with tissue corroboration of their lung disease, the authors obtained a 93.8% concordance rate between cytology and histology results. They conclude that uniform verification criteria, as well as careful analysis of "suspects" and false negatives, can lead to better patient care through improved quality control.
本文作者报告了在一家医疗中心进行的为期十年的一系列经胸细针穿刺细胞学研究。他们用于“阳性”和“非阳性”结果的验证标准在经胸细针穿刺活检(TFNA)文献中是独一无二的,作者对假阴性病例的详细分析也是如此。作者的统计结果包括特异性为100%;敏感性为79.0%;总体准确率为83.0%。13例假阴性研究中有11例(84.6%)是采样误差所致;其余两例(均为“疑似病例”)是细胞病理学家判断错误的结果。在那些肺部疾病有组织证实的患者中,作者在细胞学和组织学结果之间获得了93.8%的一致率。他们得出结论,统一的验证标准,以及对“疑似病例”和假阴性病例的仔细分析,可以通过改进质量控制,为患者提供更好的护理。