Schoeffler P, Haberer J P, Holzer J, Bonnard M, Voitellier E
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1984;3(3):171-6. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(84)80048-9.
The haemodynamic effects of midazolam were compared with those of flunitrazepam in 10 patients with severe head injury under controlled ventilation. Right atrial pressure, pulmonary pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and cardiac output were measured using a Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter. Arterial pressure (Pa) was recorded by radial arterial canulation. All patients in this cross-over study received midazolam (0.15 mg X kg-1) and flunitrazepam (0.02 mg X kg-1) intravenously randomly, with 24 h between the two injections. The measurements were first carried out before and then 5, 10, 20, 30 and 60 min after injection. The only significant variations after midazolam and flunitrazepam were a fall in Pa (from 93 +/- 12 to 81 +/- 11 mmHg for midazolam and from 89 +/- 14 to 78 +/- 20 mmHg for flunitrazepam) and in cardiac index (from 4.80 +/- 1.03 to 4.17 +/- 1.14 l X min-1 X m-2 for midazolam and from 5.18 +/- 1.32 to 4.54 +/- 1.03 l X min-1 X m-2 for flunitrazepam). The small decrease in heart rate was not significant. The cardiovascular changes after midazolam and flunitrazepam were small and similar for both drugs. It seemed that midazolam and flunitrazepam were safe for sedating head injured patients under controlled ventilation.
在控制通气条件下,对10例重型颅脑损伤患者比较了咪达唑仑和氟硝西泮的血流动力学效应。使用Swan-Ganz热稀释导管测量右心房压力、肺动脉压力、肺毛细血管楔压和心输出量。通过桡动脉插管记录动脉压(Pa)。在这项交叉研究中,所有患者随机静脉注射咪达唑仑(0.15mg/kg)和氟硝西泮(0.02mg/kg),两次注射间隔24小时。在注射前以及注射后5、10、20、30和60分钟进行测量。咪达唑仑和氟硝西泮注射后唯一显著的变化是Pa下降(咪达唑仑从93±12mmHg降至81±11mmHg,氟硝西泮从89±14mmHg降至78±20mmHg)以及心脏指数下降(咪达唑仑从4.80±1.03降至4.17±1.14l·min⁻¹·m⁻²,氟硝西泮从5.18±1.32降至4.54±1.03l·min⁻¹·m⁻²)。心率的小幅下降不显著。咪达唑仑和氟硝西泮后的心血管变化较小,且两种药物相似。似乎咪达唑仑和氟硝西泮在控制通气下对颅脑损伤患者进行镇静是安全的。