Janisch H D, Weihrauch T R, Hampel K E
Dig Dis Sci. 1984 Aug;29(8):689-95. doi: 10.1007/BF01312939.
The change in pressure of competent and incompetent lower esophageal sphincter (LES) due to abdominal compression is still a controversial subject. Therefore, we studied the effect of sustained (SAC) and intermittent (IAC) abdominal compression on lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) in normals (N), patients with hiatus hernia (HH), and patients with scleroderma (S). When resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure exceeded 15 mm Hg, response to SAC and IAC was similar in patients with HH and in normals. On the other hand when basal LESP was below 15 mm Hg, stimulated sphincter pressure during IAC was significantly lower than during SAC. Values recorded during SAC were also falsely high in patients with scleroderma. Values obtained during either SAC or IAC did not depend on presence or absence of reflux symptoms in any group. LES stimulation with IAC gives valid results which correlate closely with LESP. Stress tests with IAC therefore seem to be a useful stimulation test for the analysis of LES function.
由于腹部受压导致的正常和功能不全的食管下括约肌(LES)压力变化仍是一个有争议的话题。因此,我们研究了持续腹部加压(SAC)和间歇性腹部加压(IAC)对正常人群(N)、食管裂孔疝患者(HH)和硬皮病患者(S)食管下括约肌压力(LESP)的影响。当静息食管下括约肌压力超过15 mmHg时,HH患者和正常人群对SAC和IAC的反应相似。另一方面,当基础LESP低于15 mmHg时,IAC期间刺激的括约肌压力显著低于SAC期间。硬皮病患者在SAC期间记录的值也存在假高情况。在任何组中,SAC或IAC期间获得的值均不取决于反流症状的有无。IAC刺激LES可得出与LESP密切相关的有效结果。因此,IAC压力测试似乎是分析LES功能的一种有用的刺激测试。