• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度精神残疾者护理的限制性

Restrictiveness of care among the severely mentally disabled.

作者信息

Hargreaves W A, Gaynor J, Ransohoff P, Attkisson C C

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 Jul;35(7):706-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.7.706.

DOI:10.1176/ps.35.7.706
PMID:6745877
Abstract

Restrictiveness of care was assessed among 286 severely mentally disabled individuals known to an urban community mental health center. By examining clinical records, the authors rated each subject for each month during a period of up to 85 months on four dimensions of restrictiveness: physical freedom, time constraints, legal status, and conservatorship. The maximum restrictiveness experienced by most of the subjects was high, reflecting periodic involuntary hospitalization. The average restrictiveness they experienced, however, was well below the level represented by state hospital care. Thus the authors suggest that the average restrictiveness experienced by this population has been reduced since the initiation of deinstitutionalization.

摘要

在一个城市社区心理健康中心所了解的286名严重精神残疾个体中评估了护理的限制性。通过检查临床记录,作者在长达85个月的期间内,就身体自由、时间限制、法律地位和监护权这四个限制性维度,对每个月的每个受试者进行评分。大多数受试者经历的最大限制性较高,这反映了周期性的非自愿住院治疗。然而,他们经历的平均限制性远低于州立医院护理所代表的水平。因此,作者认为自去机构化开始以来,这一人群所经历的平均限制性有所降低。

相似文献

1
Restrictiveness of care among the severely mentally disabled.重度精神残疾者护理的限制性
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 Jul;35(7):706-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.7.706.
2
Measuring restrictiveness of psychiatric care.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 May;33(5):361-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.5.361.
3
Research articles and comments developing community mental health center-criminal justice system interactions.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1978;1(4):427-36.
4
Mentally ill women in a county jail.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Apr;40(4):363-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790040017002.
5
The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.明显需要治疗的患病患者:民事收容的第四条标准。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;36(3):259-64. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.3.259.
6
Sounding Board. Deinstitutionalization of the chronically mentally ill.意见交流。慢性精神病患者的非机构化治疗。
N Engl J Med. 1981 Aug 6;305(6):339-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198108063050609.
7
Reclaiming the community: the strengths perspective and deinstitutionalization.
Soc Work. 1992 May;37(3):204-9.
8
Liberty versus Need - Our Struggle to Care for People with Serious Mental Illness.自由与需求——我们照顾严重精神疾病患者的斗争
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1490-1495. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1610124.
9
An overview of community residences as alternatives to hospitalization.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1985 Sep;8(3):423-36.
10
Degrees of restrictiveness in psychosocial nursing.心理社会护理中的限制程度。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1983 Dec;21(12):9-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of fiscal retrenchment on public mental health services for the chronic mentally ill.
Community Ment Health J. 1986 Fall;22(3):215-28. doi: 10.1007/BF00756983.