Suppr超能文献

支付方式与选定固定医生。对报告的服务使用情况的前瞻性观察。

Mode of payment and identification with a regular doctor. A prospective look at reported use of services.

作者信息

Marcus A C, Stone J P

出版信息

Med Care. 1984 Jul;22(7):647-60. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198407000-00007.

Abstract

Despite the apparent success of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in lowering the costs of health care, they have been criticized for other reasons, including the lack of doctor-patient continuity in the patient's having a regular doctor. Consistent with previous research, HMO members sampled from Los Angeles County (N = 190) were less likely to identify with a regular doctor than comparable fee-for-service (FFS) subscribers (N = 653) (P less than 0.001). When differences in this variable were not controlled statistically, HMO members reported higher rates of physician visits, but only for acute respiratory problems (P less than 0.05). It was not until differences in having a regular doctor were taken into account that HMO members were found to report higher rates of use for all symptoms (P less than 0.05) as well as for digestive problems (P less than 0.10). These findings suggest the importance of taking physician-patient continuity into account when comparing utilization rates across health plans. Additionally, few differences were found in reports of morbidity, although HMO members were less likely to report cold symptoms during this 1-year survey than comparable FFS subscribers (P less than 0.05).

摘要

尽管健康维护组织(HMO)在降低医疗成本方面取得了显著成效,但它们也因其他原因受到批评,包括患者缺乏固定医生导致的医患连续性不足。与先前的研究一致,从洛杉矶县抽取的190名HMO成员相比653名可比的按服务收费(FFS)订阅者,更不太可能认同有固定医生(P<0.001)。当这个变量的差异没有进行统计学控制时,HMO成员报告的看医生率更高,但仅针对急性呼吸道问题(P<0.05)。直到考虑到有固定医生的差异后,才发现HMO成员报告所有症状(P<0.05)以及消化系统问题(P<0.10)的使用率更高。这些发现表明,在比较不同健康计划的利用率时,考虑医患连续性很重要。此外,在发病率报告方面几乎没有发现差异,尽管在这项为期1年的调查中,HMO成员报告感冒症状的可能性低于可比的FFS订阅者(P<0.05)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验