Frantz I D, Stark A R, Davis J M, Davies P, Kitzmiller T J
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Nov;126(5):909-13. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.909.
Effects on pulmonary surfactant, liquid, and morphologic features were compared in normal cats ventilated with conventional and high-frequency ventilators for 4 h. Normal blood gases and comparable mean airway pressures (approximately 7 cm H2O) were maintained with the two techniques. Peak tracheal pressure during conventional ventilation (16.5 +/- 0.9 cm H2O) was significantly greater than that during high-frequency ventilation (8.5 +/- 1.1 cm H2O, p less than 0.00001). Pressure-volume curves were identical in control, conventional, and high-frequency ventilation groups. There was no effect on pulmonary lavage surfactant, whether measured functionally or biochemically. Likewise, lung liquid and morphologic aspects examined by both light and electron microscopy were not affected. These results provide evidence that high-frequency ventilation under these conditions does not cause pulmonary damage.
在使用传统呼吸机和高频呼吸机对正常猫进行4小时通气的过程中,对肺表面活性物质、液体及形态学特征进行了比较。两种技术均维持了正常的血气水平及相当的平均气道压力(约7 cm H₂O)。传统通气期间的气管峰值压力(16.5±0.9 cm H₂O)显著高于高频通气期间(8.5±1.1 cm H₂O,p<0.00001)。对照组、传统通气组和高频通气组的压力-容积曲线相同。无论是功能测定还是生化测定,对肺灌洗表面活性物质均无影响。同样,通过光学显微镜和电子显微镜检查的肺液体及形态学方面也未受影响。这些结果证明,在这些条件下高频通气不会导致肺损伤。