Greenbaum K R, Zachrisson B U
Am J Orthod. 1982 Jan;81(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90283-4.
Sixty-one postorthodontic patients were examined to determine the effect of rapid and slow palatal expansion therapy on the periodontal supporting structures located at the buccal aspects on the maxillary first permanent molars. Twenty-eight patients were treated with a rapid maxillary expansion (RME) technique using a tissue-borne, fixed, split acrylic appliance (Fig. 1), while thirty-three underwent slow palatal expansion with a quad-helix appliance (Fig. 3). The two groups demonstrated mean increases in maxillary first molar width of 4.6 mm. and 4.3 mm., respectively. Twenty-eight patients treated with a similar light-wire edgewise technique but no palatal expansion were used as a control. Four periodontal parameters were examined, including level of marginal alveolar bone, attachment levels (from CEJ), probing depths, and width of keratinized gingiva. All measurements were made by the same examiner and recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm., using a specially machined and calibrated periodontal probe. The results demonstrated tht both lateral expansion groups exhibited minimal differences in periodontal condition when compared to the control group. Periodontal status was good in all groups, with average attachment levels being 0.65 mm., 0.36 mm., and 0.51 mm. in the rapid expansion, slow expansion, and control groups, respectively. Although the mean differences were clinically small, individual variation was evident (Fig. 5). Among the few persons who exhibited the more marked periodontal breakdown at the central aspect of the first molars, most were found in the RME group. Except for the type of expansion therapy experienced, none of a number of other orthodontic variables examined demonstrated a statistically significant influence on the periodontal tissues.
对61名正畸治疗后的患者进行了检查,以确定快速和慢速腭扩展疗法对上颌第一恒磨牙颊侧牙周支持结构的影响。28名患者采用组织支持式固定分裂丙烯酸矫治器进行快速上颌扩展(RME)技术治疗(图1),而33名患者采用四螺旋矫治器进行慢速腭扩展(图3)。两组上颌第一磨牙宽度的平均增加分别为4.6毫米和4.3毫米。28名接受类似细丝方丝弓技术但未进行腭扩展治疗的患者作为对照组。检查了四个牙周参数,包括边缘牙槽骨水平、附着水平(从牙釉质牙骨质界开始)、探诊深度和角化龈宽度。所有测量均由同一名检查者进行,并使用专门加工和校准的牙周探针记录到最接近的0.5毫米。结果表明,与对照组相比,两个横向扩展组的牙周状况差异最小。所有组的牙周状况良好,快速扩展组、慢速扩展组和对照组的平均附着水平分别为0.65毫米、0.36毫米和0.51毫米。虽然平均差异在临床上较小,但个体差异明显(图5)。在少数第一磨牙中央部位出现更明显牙周破坏的患者中,大多数在RME组。除了所经历的扩展治疗类型外,所检查的许多其他正畸变量对牙周组织均未显示出统计学上的显著影响。