Suppr超能文献

慢性颈部疼痛的手法治疗。一项双盲对照研究。

Manipulation for chronic neck pain. A double-blind controlled study.

作者信息

Sloop P R, Smith D S, Goldenberg E, Doré C

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Nov-Dec;7(6):532-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198211000-00003.

Abstract

Twenty-one with symptomatic cervical spondylosis or nonspecific neck pain were given an amnesic dose of diazepam before manipulation of the cervical spine. Eighteen patients served as controls and also received diazepam but no manipulation. Results were obtained in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Statements of outcome by patients and mean visual analog scales for pain and activity showed no significant differences between manipulation and control groups, though both tests favored manipulation. Control subjects subsequently treated by manipulation showed no consistent favorable response. Questionnaires dealing with personality, life events, social and medical histories, etc., provided no correlations with outcome, nor did radiographic findings. Diffuse local tenderness correlated with high pain scores after treatment. The authors conclude that the value of a single manipulation of the cervical spine has not been established and that further exploration of indications is needed. The use of intravenous diazepam should be considered because it allows a double-blind experimental design.

摘要

21例有症状的颈椎病或非特异性颈部疼痛患者在颈椎手法治疗前给予遗忘剂量的地西泮。18例患者作为对照组,也接受地西泮治疗但未进行手法治疗。结果采用随机双盲方式获得。患者的结果陈述以及疼痛和活动的平均视觉模拟量表显示,手法治疗组和对照组之间无显著差异,尽管两项测试都有利于手法治疗。随后接受手法治疗的对照组受试者未表现出一致的良好反应。关于人格、生活事件、社会和病史等的问卷调查未显示与结果有相关性,影像学检查结果也未显示相关性。弥漫性局部压痛与治疗后的高疼痛评分相关。作者得出结论,单次颈椎手法治疗的价值尚未确立,需要进一步探索其适应证。应考虑使用静脉注射地西泮,因为它允许进行双盲实验设计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验