Melville R V
Z Parasitenkd. 1980;62(1):105-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00925371.
The availability or non-availability of a name is a question of historical fact. A name once made available under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature can be rendered unavailable only by use of the plenary powers of the Commission. The question whether a name is a nomen dubium or not is a matter of taxonomic judgement. The difficulty with the Sarcocystinae discussed by Frenkel et al. (1979) stems from the fact that, under the present provisions of the Code, it is not possible to designate for the species concerned types that will serve any useful function. The Commission is now considering changes to the Code proposed to remedy this defect in a general, legislative way. It will not, as a matter of general practice, entertain proposals for the suppression of names merely because they are considered to be nomina dubia. The application submitted by Professor Frenkel and his collegaues will nevertheless be published in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature so that the Commission can, if necessary, deliver a ruling on it before the new edition of the Code has appeared.
一个名称是否可用是一个历史事实问题。根据《国际动物命名法规》,一个曾经可用的名称只有在委员会行使其全权时才能变为不可用。一个名称是否为存疑名称是一个分类学判断问题。弗伦克尔等人(1979年)所讨论的肉孢子虫亚科的困难源于这样一个事实,即在《法规》目前的规定下,无法为相关物种指定能发挥任何有用作用的模式。委员会目前正在考虑对《法规》进行修改,提议以一种全面的立法方式弥补这一缺陷。一般来说,委员会不会仅仅因为某些名称被认为是存疑名称就受理压制这些名称的提议。然而,弗伦克尔教授及其同事提交的申请将在《动物命名公报》上发表,以便委员会在《法规》新版本出版之前如有必要可对此作出裁决。