Scheffler R M, Paringer L
Med Care. 1980 May;18(5):473-84. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198005000-00001.
This study examines the economic evidence on preventive health care. A discussion of benefit-cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis, their applications to preventive strategies, and the problems inherent in implementing these approaches precedes a review of the empirical evidence. Prevention strategies are grouped into three categories: lifestyle changes, public health measures and screening programs. Lifestyle changes include altering behavior patterns as they relate to alcohol and drug abuse, smoking and automobile safety regulations. Included in public health measures are immunizations against communicable diseases, water fluoridation and food inspection. Screening includes programs for the detection of PKU and congenital hypothyroidism in newborn infants, for spina bifida cystica in the unborn fetus, and hypertension. The paper concludes that many of the preventive health measures examined represent an efficient use of resources. Because only quantifiable changes in health status or costs are included in the benefit-cost and cost-effectiveness analyses, the actual value of prevention strategies may be understated since reductions in pain and suffering usually are omitted.
本研究考察了预防性医疗保健的经济学证据。在回顾实证证据之前,先讨论了效益成本分析和成本效益分析、它们在预防策略中的应用以及实施这些方法所固有的问题。预防策略分为三类:生活方式改变、公共卫生措施和筛查项目。生活方式改变包括改变与酗酒、药物滥用、吸烟和汽车安全法规相关的行为模式。公共卫生措施包括针对传染病的免疫接种、水氟化和食品检查。筛查包括针对新生儿苯丙酮尿症和先天性甲状腺功能减退症、未出生胎儿脊柱裂囊肿以及高血压的检测项目。本文得出结论,所考察的许多预防性健康措施代表了资源的有效利用。由于效益成本分析和成本效益分析中仅包括健康状况或成本的可量化变化,预防策略的实际价值可能被低估,因为疼痛和痛苦的减轻通常被忽略了。