Suppr超能文献

[抽吸式和压力式通风对育肥站小气候及猪生产性能的影响]

[The effect of suction and pressure type of ventilation on the microclimate of fattening stations and on the production performance of pigs].

作者信息

Drybcák J

出版信息

Vet Med (Praha). 1980 Apr;25(4):205-11.

PMID:6773207
Abstract

The microclimate in fattening houses of the TEROZ TACHOV type was studied in two fattening seasons. One of the houses had the original ventilation based on negative pressure and the other was tested as to the function and effect of overpressure ventilation. Under the given conditions, the comparison of the two systems showed that the pressure ventilation drove more air through the zone where the animals were kept, and was connected with higher cooling. Dust nuisance was reduced by the pressure ventilation system, but the temperatures and humidites in the fattening houses were influenced, since it slightly increased the temperatures in the house as a result of the flow of hot air from outside in summer, and considerably cooled the microclimate in the house in winter. Nevertheless, the pressure ventilation system provided a better microclimate for the pigs: their gains were higher and the mortality was lower.

摘要

在两个育肥季节对TEROZ塔霍夫型育肥舍的小气候进行了研究。其中一个猪舍采用基于负压的原始通风方式,另一个则对正压通风的功能和效果进行了测试。在给定条件下,两种系统的比较表明,正压通风使更多空气流经饲养动物的区域,并带来更高的降温效果。正压通风系统减少了灰尘滋扰,但影响了育肥舍的温度和湿度,因为在夏季,外部热空气的流入会使舍内温度略有升高,而在冬季则会使舍内小气候显著降温。尽管如此,正压通风系统为猪提供了更好的小气候:它们的增重更高,死亡率更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验