Carlon G C, Kahn R C, Howland W S, Ray C, Turnbull A D
Crit Care Med. 1981 Jan;9(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198101000-00001.
High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) has been used in recent years in some forms of respiratory failure, where the presence of barotrauma limited the application of high peak inspiratory pressure. In the present report, the authors describe the clinical experience with 17 patients, who could not be supported with conventional mechanical support and were placed on HFJV. Rates of 100 breath/min, inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2 and cannula size of 1.06--1.62 mm (18--14) gauge were used. Driving pressure required to maintain a PaCO2 of 40--45 torr was 14--45 psig; however, except in 2 patients who developed hemorrhagic tracheitis with subtotal obstruction of both mainstem bronchi, a driving pressure higher than 27 psig was never required, even when PEEP up to 32 cm H2O was used. Of 17 patients treated, 8 survived. In all cases, alveolar ventilation could be maintained within the desired range with high frequency ventilation, even in those patients who eventually died; mechanical support never provided better oxygenation or alveolar ventilation than high frequency ventilation. Hemodynamic function was essentially unchanged with high frequency ventilation; indeed, in three cases, inotropic support with dopamine could be discontinued after initiation of high frequency ventilation.
近年来,高频喷射通气(HFJV)已应用于某些形式的呼吸衰竭,在这些病例中,气压伤的存在限制了高峰吸气压的应用。在本报告中,作者描述了17例患者的临床经验,这些患者无法通过传统机械支持进行治疗,因而接受了高频喷射通气治疗。使用的频率为每分钟100次呼吸,吸呼比为1:2,插管尺寸为1.06 - 1.62毫米(18 - 14号)。维持动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)在40 - 45托所需的驱动压力为14 - 45磅力/平方英寸;然而,除了2例发生出血性气管炎且双侧主支气管几乎完全阻塞的患者外,即使使用高达32厘米水柱的呼气末正压(PEEP),也从未需要高于27磅力/平方英寸的驱动压力。在接受治疗的17例患者中,8例存活。在所有病例中,即使是最终死亡的患者,高频通气也能将肺泡通气维持在理想范围内;机械支持从未比高频通气提供更好的氧合或肺泡通气。高频通气时血流动力学功能基本未变;实际上,在3例患者中,开始高频通气后可停用多巴胺进行的强心支持。