• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估两家医院呼吸治疗服务角色的变化。

Evaluating the changing role of respiratory therapy services at two hospitals.

作者信息

Braun S R, Smith F R, McCarthy T M, Minsloff M

出版信息

JAMA. 1981;245(20):2033-7.

PMID:6785458
Abstract

An analysis of respiratory therapy services at two general hospitals showed a notable change from 1971 to 1979. There was a large decrease in intermittent positive-pressure breathing (IPPB) treatments at both hospitals. These were partially replaced with general chest physiotherapy maneuvers at one hospital and with incentive spirometry at another. Both hospitals demonstrated a substantial increase in time spent in management of mechanical ventilators. Staffs had increased along with time spent per patient. The reduction in IPPB was not associated with lower costs of respiratory therapy service at either hospital but, rather, a shift in the types of service performed. These changes must be considered in determining cost-effectiveness of respiratory therapy services.

摘要

对两家综合医院呼吸治疗服务的分析显示,1971年至1979年期间出现了显著变化。两家医院的间歇性正压通气(IPPB)治疗大幅减少。在一家医院,这些治疗部分被常规胸部物理治疗操作所取代,而在另一家医院则被激励性肺量计所取代。两家医院在机械通气管理上花费的时间都大幅增加。随着每位患者花费时间的增加,工作人员也有所增加。IPPB的减少与两家医院呼吸治疗服务成本的降低并无关联,而是服务类型发生了转变。在确定呼吸治疗服务的成本效益时,必须考虑这些变化。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the changing role of respiratory therapy services at two hospitals.评估两家医院呼吸治疗服务角色的变化。
JAMA. 1981;245(20):2033-7.
2
Good news! Bad news? The status of respiratory therapy in the 1980s.
JAMA. 1981;245(20):2059.
3
Use of a computerized respiratory care record system to study utilization of IPPB therapy.使用计算机化呼吸护理记录系统来研究间歇性正压通气(IPPB)治疗的使用情况。
Respir Care. 1983 Mar;28(3):309-14.
4
IPPB controversy: a discussion.
Respir Care. 1977 Oct;22(10):1087, 1089, 1091 passim.
5
Volume orientation: a system to reduce fruitless IPPB treatments.容量定向:一种减少无效间歇性正压通气治疗的系统。
Conn Med. 1978 Dec;42(12):765-7.
6
Ancillary services: do criteria cut use of respiratory therapy?辅助服务:标准是否会减少呼吸治疗的使用?
Hosp Peer Rev. 1979 Jan;4(1):13-4.
7
Why pick on IPPB?为什么单挑间歇性正压通气(IPPB)的毛病?
Respir Care. 1977 Sep;22(9):902, 904.
8
Intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) versus incentive spirometer (IS) therapy in the postoperative period.
Intensive Care Med. 1977 Dec;3(4):279-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01641120.
9
A proposal for the more rational use of IPPB: volume orientation.关于更合理使用间歇性正压通气(IPPB)的建议:容量导向
Respir Care. 1976 Apr;21(4):318-22.
10
[Prophylactic and therapeutic intermittent positive pressure breathing with combined therapeutic aerosols (IPPB/I)--functional and morphological effects. II. Therapeutic IPPB/I in ventilation disturbances of the lung (author's transl)].
Z Erkr Atmungsorgane. 1981;156(2):151-8.