Smith I E, Harris A L, Morgan M, Ford H T, Gazet J C, Harmer C L, White H, Parsons C A, Villardo A, Walsh G, McKinna J A
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Nov 28;283(6304):1432-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.283.6304.1432.
Altogether 117 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with either tamoxifen 10 mg by mouth twice daily or aminoglutethimide 250 mg by mouth four times daily with hydrocortisone 20 mg twice daily in a randomised cross-over trial in which patients who failed to respond to the first treatment or relapsed while receiving it were switched to the other. Eighteen (30%) out of 60 patients initially treated with tamoxifen achieved an objective response and 11 (18%) showed stable disease. Seventeen (30%) out of 57 patients treated initially with aminoglutethimide achieved an objective response and 13 (23%) achieved stable disease. Objective responses in bone metastases were achieved more commonly with aminoglutethimide (11 patients (35%)) than with tamoxifen (five (17%)). The predicted median duration of response for tamoxifen was 15 months and for aminoglutethimide over 15 months (no significant difference). Five (15%) out of 34 patients who failed to respond to tamoxifen and four out of six patients who relapsed after responding to tamoxifen subsequently responded to aminoglutethimide. In contrast, only two (6%) out of 31 patients who failed to respond to aminoglutethimide and none out of four patients who relapsed while receiving aminoglutethimide subsequently responded to tamoxifen. The main side effects occurring in the 97 patients who received aminoglutethimide as first- or second-line treatment were lethargy and drowsiness (36 patients) and rash (29); seven patients had to stop treatment because of side effects. In contrast, side effects were rare and mild with tamoxifen and no patient had to stop treatment because of them. Both tamoxifen and aminoglutethimide appeared from this study to be equally effective in the medical endocrine treatment of advanced breast cancer.
在一项随机交叉试验中,117例晚期乳腺癌患者被随机分为两组,一组每日口服两次他莫昔芬10毫克,另一组每日口服四次氨鲁米特250毫克,同时每日口服两次氢化可的松20毫克。若患者对第一种治疗无反应或在接受治疗期间复发,则换用另一种治疗。最初接受他莫昔芬治疗的60例患者中,有18例(30%)获得客观缓解,11例(18%)病情稳定。最初接受氨鲁米特治疗的57例患者中,有17例(30%)获得客观缓解,13例(23%)病情稳定。氨鲁米特治疗骨转移的客观缓解率(11例患者,35%)高于他莫昔芬(5例,17%)。他莫昔芬的预计中位缓解持续时间为15个月,氨鲁米特超过15个月(无显著差异)。34例对他莫昔芬无反应的患者中有5例(15%),6例对他莫昔芬有反应后复发的患者中有4例随后对氨鲁米特产生反应。相比之下,31例对氨鲁米特无反应的患者中只有2例(6%),4例在接受氨鲁米特治疗期间复发的患者中无一例随后对他莫昔芬产生反应。97例接受氨鲁米特一线或二线治疗的患者中,主要副作用为嗜睡和困倦(36例)以及皮疹(29例);7例患者因副作用不得不停止治疗。相比之下,他莫昔芬的副作用罕见且轻微,没有患者因副作用而停止治疗。从这项研究来看,他莫昔芬和氨鲁米特在晚期乳腺癌的医学内分泌治疗中似乎同样有效。